Changes proposed in this pull request:
- Use `strnatcasecmp()` inside `listSortedCategories()`
How to test the feature manually:
1. Create categories `A`, `b`, and `C`
2. Observe that categories are sorted case-insensitively on the feed index and Subscription Management pages
* Fix bigint timestamps on 32-bit
fix https://github.com/FreshRSS/FreshRSS/issues/7374
SQL requests for BIGINT fields may return a string on 32-bit systems instead of an integer
* Calculations may also be string
* add shortcut in config
* open my labels menu with shortcut
* the first 9 items are selectable + input field
* i18n
* Update app/i18n/nl/conf.php
Co-authored-by: Frans de Jonge <fransdejonge@gmail.com>
* index.menu.mylabels
* order fixed
---------
Co-authored-by: Frans de Jonge <fransdejonge@gmail.com>
Add option to sort results by received date (existing, default), publication date, title, URL (link), random.
fix https://github.com/FreshRSS/FreshRSS/issues/1771
fix https://github.com/FreshRSS/FreshRSS/issues/2083
fix https://github.com/FreshRSS/FreshRSS/issues/2119
fix https://github.com/FreshRSS/FreshRSS/issues/2596
fix https://github.com/FreshRSS/FreshRSS/issues/3204
fix https://github.com/FreshRSS/FreshRSS/issues/4405
fix https://github.com/FreshRSS/FreshRSS/issues/5529
fix https://github.com/FreshRSS/FreshRSS/issues/5864
fix https://github.com/FreshRSS/Extensions/issues/161
URL parameters:
* `&sort=id` (current behaviour, sorting according to newest received articles)
* `&sort=date` (publication date, which is not indicative of how new an article is)
* `&sort=title`
* `&sort=link`
* `&sort=rand` (random order - which disables infinite scrolling, at least for now)
combined with `&order=ASC` or `&order=DESC`
## Implementation notes
The sorting criteria by *received date* (id), which is the default, and which was the only one before this PR, is the one that has the best sorting characteristics:
* *uniqueness*: no entries have the exact same received date
* *monotonicity*: new entries always have a higher received date
* *performance*: this field is efficiently indexed in database for fast usage, including for paging (indexing could also be done to other fields, but with lower effective performance)
In contrary, sorting criteria such as by *publication date*, by *title*, or by *link* are neither unique nor monotonic. In particular, multiple articles may share the same *publication date*, and we may receive articles with a *publication date* far in the future, and then later some new articles with a *publication date* far in the past.
To understand why sorting by *publication date* is problematic, it helps to think about sorting by *title* or by *link*, as sorting by *title* and by *publication date* share more or less the same characteristics.
### Problem 1: new articles
New articles may be received in the background after what is shown on screen, and before the next user action such as *mark all as read*. Due to the lack of *monotonicity* when sorting by e.g. *publication date* or *title*, users risk marking as read a batch of articles containing some fresh articles without seeing them.
Mitigation: A parameter `idMax` tracks the maximum ID related to a batch of actions such as *mark all as read* to exclude articles received after those that are displayed.
### Problem 2: paging / pagination
When navigating articles, only a few articles are displayed, and a new "page" of articles needs to be received from the database when scrolling down or when clicking the button to show more articles. When sorting by e.g. *publication date* or *title*, it is not trivial to show the next page without re-showing some of the same articles, and without skipping any. Indeed, views are often with additional criteria such as showing only unread articles, and users may mark some articles as read while viewing them, hereby removing some articles from the previous pages. And like for *Problem 1*, new articles may have been received in the background. Consequently, it is not possible to use `OFFSET` to implement pagination (so the patches suggested by a few users were wrong due to that, in particular).
Mitigation: `idMax` is also used (just like for *Problem 1*) and a *Keyset Pagination* approach is used, combining an unstable sorting criterion such as *publication date* or *title*, together with *id* to ensure stable sorting. (So, 2 sorting criteria + 1 filter criteria)
See e.g. https://www.alwaysdeveloping.net/dailydrop/2022/07/01-keyset-pagination/
### Problem 3: performance
Sorting by anything else than *received date* (id) is doomed to be slow(er) due to the combination of 3 criteria (see *Problem 2*). An `OFFSET` approach (which is not possible anyway as explained) would be even slower. Furthermore, we have no SQL index at the moment, but they would not necessarily help much due to the multiple sorting criteria needed and involving some `OR` logic which is difficult to optimise for databases.
The nicest syntax would be using tuples and corresponding indexes, but that is poorly supported by MySQL https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=104128
Mitigation: a compatibility SQL syntax is used to implement *Keyset Pagination*
### Problem 4: user confusion
Several users have shown that they do not fully understand the difference between *received date* and *publication date*, and particularly not the pitfalls of *publication date*.
Mitigation: the menus to mark-as-read *before 1 day* and *before 1 week* are disabled when sorting by anything else than *received date*. Likewise, the separation headers *Today* and *Yesterday* and *Before yesterday* are only shown when sorting by *received date*.
Again here, to better understand why, it helps to think about sorting by *title* or by *link*, as sorting by *title* and by *publication date* share more or less the same characteristics.
* [ ] We should write a Q&A and/or documentation about the problems associated to *sorting by publication date*: risks of not noticing new publication, of inadvertently marking them as read, of having some articles with a date in the future hanging at the top of the views (vice versa when sorting in ascending order), performance, etc.
### Problem 5: APIs
Sorting by anything else than *received date* breaks the guarantees needed for a successful synchronisation via API.
Mitigation: sorting by *received date* is ensured for all API calls.
* PHPStan 2.0
fix https://github.com/FreshRSS/FreshRSS/issues/6989https://github.com/phpstan/phpstan/releases/tag/2.0.0https://github.com/phpstan/phpstan/blob/2.0.x/UPGRADING.md
* More
* More
* Done
* fix i18n CLI
* Restore a PHPStan Next test
For work towards PHPStan Level 10
* 4 more on Level 10
* fix getTagsForEntry
* API at Level 10
* More Level 10
* Finish Minz at Level 10
* Finish CLI at Level 10
* Finish Controllers at Level 10
* More Level 10
* More
* Pass bleedingEdge
* Clean PHPStan options and add TODOs
* Level 10 for main config
* More
* Consitency array vs. list
* Sanitize themes get_infos
* Simplify TagDAO->getTagsForEntries()
* Finish reportAnyTypeWideningInVarTag
* Prepare checkBenevolentUnionTypes and checkImplicitMixed
* Fixes
* Refix
* Another fix
* Casing of __METHOD__ constant
* configs
* add the icon in the entry header line
* rename comment
* Update main.js
* CSS
* comment typo fix
* fix gloabl view my labels menu
* improved: my labels dropdown with triangle now. yay!
* Allow regex parentheses
While waiting for a new better search parser, auto-escape parentheses in regex expressions to allow them like in `/^(ab|cd)/`
* Allow escaped parenthesis in regex
* A couple more tests
* Add privacy settings on extension list retrieval
There is a new privacy page to handle all configuration related to privacy. At
the moment, only privacy related to extensions can be configured.
The new settings allow to change the location of the extension list file and to
choose if the selected file is cached for a day or retrieved for each request.
Fix#4570
* Update code to pass PHPStan
* make fix-all
---------
Co-authored-by: maTh <math-home@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Alapetite <alexandre@alapetite.fr>
* Add move to next unread Label on mark as read.
The Labels, unlike the Feeds and Categories, don't move to the next
unread when "move to next unread on mark all as read" user feature is
enabled.
Labels are more complex than Feeds and Categories because Entries can be
in more than Label at a time. So when marking all Entries in the Label
as read, it can cause other Labels to end up with all their Entries
marked as read as well. The calculation of what the next
Label/Feed/Category is to jump to normally happens when generating the
link for the "Mark as Read" buttons, but it can't for Labels.
To address the problem for Labels, use a placeholder value during the
pre-calculation of the "Mark as Read" button link. When that placeholder
value is encountered during the "Mark as Read" action, the next Label
with unread Entries will be calculated immediately after the mark as
read action has been processed.
Fix all the translations of the 'jump_next' text to remove the '(feed or
categories' part that no longer applies.
Attempt to fix the inconsistent Russian, Italian, and Polish
translations of 'jump_next' text, which phrased the '(feed or
categories)' part differently.
* Minor code formattting
* Fixes
* Optimize next label lookup.
Only get the tag list once, and actually error check that it returned successfully.
Fix a typo in a comment as well.
* Fix fallback when all Labels are read.
Fix the missing check for whether we're in the fallback case or not.
* Update app/i18n/ru/conf.php
* Update app/Controllers/entryController.php
* Minor changes
* One more minor
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Alapetite <alexandre@alapetite.fr>
New set of unicity criteria options.
New tolerance heuristic:
> `$invalidGuidsTolerance` (default 0.05) The maximum ratio (rounded) of invalid GUIDs to tolerate before degrading the unicity criteria.
> Example for 0.05 (5% rounded): tolerate 0 invalid GUIDs for up to 9 articles, 1 for 10, 2 for 30, 3 for 50, 4 for 70, 5 for 90, 6 for 110, etc.
> The default value of 5% rounded was chosen to allow 1 invalid GUID for feeds of 10 articles, which is a frequently observed amount of articles.
* New feed mode: HTML + XPath + JSON dot notation (JSON in HTML)
Same as `JSON+DotNotation` but first extracting the JSON string from an HTML document thanks to an XPath expression.
Example: `//script[@type='application/json']`
fix https://github.com/FreshRSS/FreshRSS/discussions/6876
* JavaScript UI to show/hide new field
* Casing xPathToJson
* Slight renaming
