sglang backend: pass through thinking_budget + require_reasoning (#12193)

* sglang backend: pass through thinking_budget + require_reasoning

sglang's raw Engine.async_generate() API (which this backend calls
directly, bypassing sglang's own OpenAI server) supports a precise,
tokenizer-derived reasoning-length budget via
sampling_params["custom_params"]["thinking_budget"] plus
require_reasoning=True, gated behind --enable-strict-thinking. Neither
was reachable through LocalAI: this backend built sampling_params only
from a fixed field mapping (temperature, top_p, ...) with no custom_params
key, and never passed require_reasoning to async_generate at all.

- LoadModel now reads a model-level "thinking_budget" option (same
  mechanism as the existing tool_parser/reasoning_parser options), and
  _build_sampling_params adds it as custom_params.thinking_budget on
  every request when configured.
- _new_reasoning_parser already derives, from the rendered prompt, whether
  the model's chat template pre-opened a reasoning block (Qwen3-style
  templates append <think> to the prompt instead of letting the model
  emit it) -- the same signal sglang's own OpenAI server computes from
  per-template config to decide require_reasoning. This backend has no
  template manager, so it now returns that signal too and _predict
  forwards it to async_generate(require_reasoning=...).

Verified against production (NVFP4, sm_121, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B) via a raw
Engine.async_generate() call bypassing this backend: 301 reasoning
tokens against a 300-token budget, clean completion, ~27s. Not yet
verified through this backend's own gRPC path end-to-end (no local
CUDA/sglang environment available here) -- existing + new unit tests in
test.py cover the pure-Python merge/passthrough logic only.

Scope note: require_reasoning is derived only from the existing
prompt-suffix heuristic, not sglang's full per-template
_get_reasoning_from_request decision tree (minimax-m3/hunyuan special
cases etc.) -- this backend has no template manager to evaluate that
tree against, and the prompt-suffix check is the one heuristic already
validated in this file (test_reasoning_parser_forced_when_template_prefills_think_tag).

Signed-off-by: pos-ei-don <1822533+pos-ei-don@users.noreply.github.com>

* sglang backend: honour a model-level reasoning_default

A model YAML can already carry "parameters: reasoning_effort:", but that
value only reaches this backend when a *caller* sets it per request (the Go
side turns it into Metadata["enable_thinking"]). As a model-level default it
is silently dropped: a config reading "reasoning_effort: none" still produces
full reasoning on every request, so the config says one thing and the model
does another.

That gap is expensive in practice. On a self-hosted Qwen3.6-35B-A3B the
reasoning phase consumed the entire max_tokens budget before any content was
produced - 90% of code completions came back empty at max_tokens=768, and the
server log filled with "backend produced only reasoning, retrying". The
config looked like reasoning was off the whole time.

This adds "reasoning_default:off" (or ":on") on the same model-level
options: mechanism as thinking_budget. A per-request value always wins; the
default only fills in when the request is silent.

Measured on the stack above (sglang 0.5.20, NVFP4, GB10/sm_121) after
applying it:
  default (nothing set)          -> 0 chars reasoning, 27 tokens
  "reasoning_effort": "none"     -> 0 chars reasoning, 27 tokens
  metadata enable_thinking=true  -> capped at the 512-token thinking_budget,
                                    541 tokens total, finish_reason stop

Tests: three cases added to backend/python/sglang/test.py covering the
default, per-request override in both directions, and the unconfigured case
(which must leave the template untouched).

Signed-off-by: pos-ei-don <1822533+pos-ei-don@users.noreply.github.com>

* sglang backend: validate thinking_budget instead of crashing LoadModel

Addresses the review on this PR:

- `int(thinking_budget)` raised on values like "5000.0" or "abc" and took
  LoadModel down. The option is now parsed by _parse_thinking_budget():
  integral numbers in any spelling are accepted, anything else is ignored
  with a warning on stderr.
- Zero and negative budgets are ignored with a warning instead of being
  passed to sglang, where they have no defined meaning. Turning reasoning
  off is what reasoning_default:off is for.
- A load-time warning when thinking_budget is set but enable_strict_thinking
  is not in engine_args, since sglang then ignores the budget silently.
- Tests for integral spellings, unset, zero, negative, non-integer and the
  strict-thinking warning.

Signed-off-by: pos-ei-don <1822533+pos-ei-don@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(sglang): explain reasoning options

Document the reasoning budget, strict-thinking requirement, and
precedence of request metadata over the model-level default.

Also note that the budget has to stay well below max_tokens (otherwise
it never triggers and the reply can end up empty), and that
POST /models/reload or a backend-only restart does not pick up changed
options; LocalAI itself has to be restarted.

Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-6
Signed-off-by: pos-ei-don <1822533+pos-ei-don@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(sglang): clarify configuration reloads

Distinguish rereading model configuration from updating a running backend. Keep the full LocalAI restart recommendation for changed reasoning options.

Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-6

* sglang backend: only pass require_reasoning when sglang supports it

Engine.async_generate() gained the require_reasoning keyword in sglang
0.5.13 and takes no **kwargs. The CPU profile builds v0.5.11 from source
and the other profiles only set a >=0.5.11 floor, so passing the keyword
unconditionally made every request fail with TypeError. Detect support
once at import time, as the file already does for sampling_seed.

enable_strict_thinking first appears in sglang 0.5.12; fix the comment.

Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5 [Claude Code]

---------

Signed-off-by: pos-ei-don <1822533+pos-ei-don@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
Co-authored-by: localai-org-maint-bot <localai-org-maint-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
This commit is contained in:
authored and GitHub committed 2026-09-28 04:49:37 +02:00
1 parent 0e4347037f
commit 61f4f67b75
3 files changed
+302 -16

No files matched your search

+146 -11
View File
@@ -90,6 +90,19 @@ except Exception:
_SEED_KEY = "sampling_seed"
# Engine.async_generate() only grew a require_reasoning keyword in sglang
# 0.5.13. The CPU build compiles v0.5.11 from source and the other profiles
# only set a >=0.5.11 floor, and async_generate() takes no **kwargs, so
# passing the keyword unconditionally fails every request with TypeError.
try:
import inspect as _inspect
_ASYNC_GENERATE_HAS_REQUIRE_REASONING = (
"require_reasoning" in _inspect.signature(Engine.async_generate).parameters
)
except Exception:
_ASYNC_GENERATE_HAS_REQUIRE_REASONING = False
_ONE_DAY_IN_SECONDS = 60 * 60 * 24
# proto3 has no field presence, so an explicit 0 is indistinguishable from
@@ -105,6 +118,12 @@ MAX_WORKERS = int(os.environ.get('PYTHON_GRPC_MAX_WORKERS', '1'))
class BackendServicer(backend_pb2_grpc.BackendServicer):
"""gRPC servicer implementing the Backend service for sglang."""
# Class-level default so a servicer used before LoadModel (e.g. in unit
# tests that construct it directly) doesn't AttributeError in
# _build_sampling_params.
thinking_budget: Optional[int] = None
reasoning_default: Optional[str] = None
def _parse_options(self, options_list) -> Dict[str, str]:
opts: Dict[str, str] = {}
for opt in options_list:
@@ -114,6 +133,49 @@ class BackendServicer(backend_pb2_grpc.BackendServicer):
opts[key.strip()] = value.strip()
return opts
@staticmethod
def _parse_thinking_budget(value) -> Optional[int]:
"""Turn the `thinking_budget` model option into a positive int, or None.
Options arrive as strings from the YAML `options:` list, but a value
like "5000.0" is a plausible thing to write, and a crash here would
take down LoadModel for the whole model. So: integral numbers are
accepted in any spelling ("512", "512.0"), anything else is ignored
with a warning instead of raising. Zero and negative budgets are
ignored too: sglang gives them no defined meaning, and turning
reasoning off is what `reasoning_default: off` is for.
"""
if value is None or str(value).strip() == "":
return None
raw = str(value).strip()
try:
number = float(raw)
except ValueError:
print(f"thinking_budget {raw!r} is not a number, ignoring it", file=sys.stderr)
return None
if not number.is_integer():
print(f"thinking_budget {raw!r} is not a whole number of tokens, ignoring it", file=sys.stderr)
return None
if number <= 0:
print(
f"thinking_budget {raw!r} must be positive, ignoring it "
"(use reasoning_default:off to disable reasoning)",
file=sys.stderr,
)
return None
return int(number)
@staticmethod
def _strict_thinking_warning(thinking_budget: Optional[int], engine_kwargs: dict) -> Optional[str]:
"""sglang only enforces the budget with enable_strict_thinking on; without
it the budget is silently ignored, so say so at load time."""
if thinking_budget is not None and not engine_kwargs.get("enable_strict_thinking"):
return (
f"thinking_budget={thinking_budget} is set but enable_strict_thinking is not "
"in engine_args; sglang will ignore the budget"
)
return None
def _apply_engine_args(self, engine_kwargs: dict, engine_args_json: str) -> dict:
"""Merge user-supplied engine_args (JSON object) into the kwargs dict
that will be forwarded to ``sglang.Engine`` (which constructs a
@@ -230,6 +292,35 @@ class BackendServicer(backend_pb2_grpc.BackendServicer):
self.tool_parser_name: Optional[str] = opts.get("tool_parser") or None
self.reasoning_parser_name: Optional[str] = opts.get("reasoning_parser") or None
# Fixed reasoning-length budget for every request on this model, in
# tokens. There is no protobuf field to carry a per-request
# custom_params blob, so this rides the same model-level `options:`
# mechanism as tool_parser/reasoning_parser above — mirroring how
# sglang's own `--preferred-sampling-params` is a server-wide
# default, not a per-request choice. Requires `enable_strict_thinking`
# in `engine_args:` (sglang >=0.5.12); without it sglang has no
# tokenizer-derived budget mechanism to enforce this against.
self.thinking_budget: Optional[int] = self._parse_thinking_budget(
opts.get("thinking_budget")
)
# Model-level default for whether the chat template opens a reasoning
# block, as "off" or "on". Rides the same `options:` mechanism as
# thinking_budget above.
#
# Why this is needed even though `reasoning_effort` exists: that one
# only reaches this backend when a *caller* sets it per request (the
# Go side turns it into Metadata["enable_thinking"]). As a model-level
# `parameters:` default it is silently dropped, so a config reading
# `reasoning_effort: none` still produces full reasoning on every
# request - the config says one thing and the model does another.
#
# A per-request value always wins; this only fills in the gap when the
# request says nothing.
self.reasoning_default: Optional[str] = (
opts.get("reasoning_default") or ""
).lower() or None
# Also hand the parser names to sglang's engine so its HTTP/OAI
# paths work identically if someone hits the engine directly.
if self.tool_parser_name:
@@ -247,6 +338,10 @@ class BackendServicer(backend_pb2_grpc.BackendServicer):
print(f"engine_args error: {err}", file=sys.stderr)
return backend_pb2.Result(success=False, message=str(err))
warning = self._strict_thinking_warning(self.thinking_budget, engine_kwargs)
if warning:
print(warning, file=sys.stderr)
try:
self.llm = Engine(**engine_kwargs)
except Exception as err:
@@ -362,8 +457,28 @@ class BackendServicer(backend_pb2_grpc.BackendServicer):
except json.JSONDecodeError:
sampling_params["ebnf"] = grammar
if self.thinking_budget is not None:
sampling_params["custom_params"] = {"thinking_budget": self.thinking_budget}
return sampling_params
def _thinking_default(self, request) -> Optional[bool]:
"""Whether this request should render with reasoning on, off, or unset.
Per-request ``Metadata["enable_thinking"]`` wins; the model-level
``reasoning_default`` option fills in when the request is silent.
Returns None when neither says anything, leaving template behaviour
untouched.
"""
wanted = request.Metadata.get("enable_thinking", "").lower()
if wanted in ("true", "false"):
return wanted == "true"
if self.reasoning_default == "off":
return False
if self.reasoning_default == "on":
return True
return None
def _build_prompt(self, request) -> str:
prompt = request.Prompt
if prompt or not request.UseTokenizerTemplate or not request.Messages:
@@ -384,9 +499,9 @@ class BackendServicer(backend_pb2_grpc.BackendServicer):
template_kwargs["tools"] = json.loads(request.Tools)
except json.JSONDecodeError:
pass
_thinking = request.Metadata.get("enable_thinking", "").lower()
if _thinking in ("true", "false"):
template_kwargs["enable_thinking"] = (_thinking == "true")
_thinking = self._thinking_default(request)
if _thinking is not None:
template_kwargs["enable_thinking"] = _thinking
# sglang locates the attached images/videos by scanning the rendered
# prompt for the model's own media token, so the template has to be
@@ -438,12 +553,19 @@ class BackendServicer(backend_pb2_grpc.BackendServicer):
there files the answer as reasoning and leaves content empty. sglang's
own server keeps the two apart for the same reason — its grammar
backend owns the reasoning prefix when a reasoning parser is set.
Returns a ``(parser, forced)`` pair. ``forced`` is also the signal
``_predict`` passes as ``Engine.async_generate(require_reasoning=...)``:
sglang's own OpenAI server derives that flag from per-template
config (``ChatServing._get_reasoning_from_request``); this backend
has no template manager, so the same prompt-suffix heuristic that
already decides parser forcing doubles as that signal.
"""
if grammar_constrained:
prompt = ""
if not (HAS_REASONING_PARSERS and self.reasoning_parser_name):
return None
return None, False
kwargs = {
"model_type": self.reasoning_parser_name,
@@ -453,10 +575,12 @@ class BackendServicer(backend_pb2_grpc.BackendServicer):
parser = ReasoningParser(**kwargs)
except Exception as e:
print(f"ReasoningParser init failed: {e!r}", file=sys.stderr)
return None
return None, False
forced = False
start = getattr(getattr(parser, "detector", None), "think_start_token", None)
if start and prompt and prompt.rstrip().endswith(start):
forced = True
try:
parser = ReasoningParser(force_reasoning=True, **kwargs)
except TypeError:
@@ -469,10 +593,16 @@ class BackendServicer(backend_pb2_grpc.BackendServicer):
file=sys.stderr,
)
return parser
return parser, forced
def _make_parsers(self, request, prompt: str = ""):
"""Construct fresh per-request parser instances (stateful)."""
"""Construct fresh per-request parser instances (stateful).
Also returns ``require_reasoning`` (see ``_new_reasoning_parser``),
which ``_predict`` forwards to ``Engine.async_generate()`` so
sglang's ``--enable-strict-thinking`` grammar backend knows this
request is in a reasoning block.
"""
tool_parser = None
if HAS_TOOL_PARSERS and self.tool_parser_name and request.Tools:
@@ -485,23 +615,27 @@ class BackendServicer(backend_pb2_grpc.BackendServicer):
except Exception as e:
print(f"FunctionCallParser init failed: {e!r}", file=sys.stderr)
reasoning_parser = self._new_reasoning_parser(
reasoning_parser, require_reasoning = self._new_reasoning_parser(
True, prompt, bool(getattr(request, "Grammar", "")),
)
return tool_parser, reasoning_parser
return tool_parser, reasoning_parser, require_reasoning
async def _predict(self, request, context, streaming: bool = False):
sampling_params = self._build_sampling_params(request)
prompt = self._build_prompt(request)
tool_parser, reasoning_parser = self._make_parsers(request, prompt)
tool_parser, reasoning_parser, require_reasoning = self._make_parsers(request, prompt)
image_data = list(request.Images) if request.Images else None
video_data = list(request.Videos) if request.Videos else None
# Kick off streaming generation. We always use stream=True so the
# non-stream path still gets parser coverage on the final text.
generate_kwargs = {}
if _ASYNC_GENERATE_HAS_REQUIRE_REASONING:
generate_kwargs["require_reasoning"] = require_reasoning
try:
iterator = await self.llm.async_generate(
prompt=prompt,
@@ -509,6 +643,7 @@ class BackendServicer(backend_pb2_grpc.BackendServicer):
image_data=image_data,
video_data=video_data,
stream=True,
**generate_kwargs,
)
except Exception as e:
print(f"sglang async_generate failed: {e!r}", file=sys.stderr)
@@ -591,7 +726,7 @@ class BackendServicer(backend_pb2_grpc.BackendServicer):
final_tool_calls: List[backend_pb2.ToolCallDelta] = []
if not streaming:
final_reasoning_parser = self._new_reasoning_parser(
final_reasoning_parser, _ = self._new_reasoning_parser(
False, prompt, bool(getattr(request, "Grammar", "")),
)
+121 -5
View File
@@ -9,6 +9,13 @@ because ``_apply_engine_args`` validates keys against ``ServerArgs``
import unittest
def _request(metadata=None):
"""Minimal stand-in for a PredictOptions request in reasoning tests."""
from types import SimpleNamespace
return SimpleNamespace(Metadata=metadata or {})
class TestSglangHelpers(unittest.TestCase):
"""Tests for the pure helpers on BackendServicer (no gRPC, no engine)."""
@@ -170,13 +177,17 @@ class TestSglangHelpers(unittest.TestCase):
# What the model actually emits when the prompt ends in "<think>".
completion = "adding two and two</think>4"
forced = servicer._new_reasoning_parser(False, prompt="user: hi\n<think>\n")
forced, require_reasoning = servicer._new_reasoning_parser(
False, prompt="user: hi\n<think>\n"
)
self.assertTrue(require_reasoning)
reasoning, content = forced.parse_non_stream(completion)
self.assertEqual(reasoning, "adding two and two")
self.assertEqual(content, "4")
# No prefilled tag in the prompt: detector default, unchanged behaviour.
unforced = servicer._new_reasoning_parser(False, prompt="user: hi\n")
unforced, require_reasoning = servicer._new_reasoning_parser(False, prompt="user: hi\n")
self.assertFalse(require_reasoning)
reasoning, content = unforced.parse_non_stream(completion)
self.assertFalse(reasoning)
self.assertEqual(content, completion)
@@ -187,7 +198,8 @@ class TestSglangHelpers(unittest.TestCase):
servicer = self._servicer()
servicer.reasoning_parser_name = "qwen3"
parser = servicer._new_reasoning_parser(False, prompt="user: primes?\n")
parser, require_reasoning = servicer._new_reasoning_parser(False, prompt="user: primes?\n")
self.assertFalse(require_reasoning)
reasoning, content = parser.parse_non_stream("2,3,5,7,11")
self.assertFalse(reasoning)
self.assertEqual(content, "2,3,5,7,11")
@@ -200,9 +212,10 @@ class TestSglangHelpers(unittest.TestCase):
servicer.reasoning_parser_name = "qwen3"
schema_out = '{"findings": [{"line": 42, "issue": "off-by-one"}]}'
parser = servicer._new_reasoning_parser(
parser, require_reasoning = servicer._new_reasoning_parser(
False, prompt="audit this\n<think>\n", grammar_constrained=True,
)
self.assertFalse(require_reasoning)
reasoning, content = parser.parse_non_stream(schema_out)
self.assertFalse(reasoning)
self.assertEqual(content, schema_out)
@@ -210,7 +223,110 @@ class TestSglangHelpers(unittest.TestCase):
def test_reasoning_parser_absent_without_configured_parser(self):
servicer = self._servicer()
servicer.reasoning_parser_name = None
self.assertIsNone(servicer._new_reasoning_parser(False, prompt="<think>"))
parser, require_reasoning = servicer._new_reasoning_parser(False, prompt="<think>")
self.assertIsNone(parser)
self.assertFalse(require_reasoning)
def test_reasoning_default_off_applies_when_request_is_silent(self):
"""A model configured with reasoning_default:off must render with
thinking disabled even when the request carries no enable_thinking -
that is the whole point: `parameters: reasoning_effort:` never
reaches this backend, so without this the config lies about the
default."""
servicer = self._servicer()
servicer.reasoning_default = "off"
self.assertIs(servicer._thinking_default(_request(metadata={})), False)
def test_request_metadata_overrides_reasoning_default(self):
"""A per-request value always wins over the model-level default -
in both directions."""
servicer = self._servicer()
servicer.reasoning_default = "off"
self.assertIs(
servicer._thinking_default(_request(metadata={"enable_thinking": "true"})),
True,
)
servicer.reasoning_default = "on"
self.assertIs(
servicer._thinking_default(_request(metadata={"enable_thinking": "false"})),
False,
)
def test_no_reasoning_default_leaves_template_untouched(self):
"""Unconfigured must stay unconfigured: returning None means the
backend adds no enable_thinking kwarg at all, so the template keeps
whatever default it ships with."""
servicer = self._servicer()
self.assertIsNone(servicer._thinking_default(_request(metadata={})))
def test_thinking_budget_added_to_sampling_params_as_custom_params(self):
"""The model-level thinking_budget option (set from LoadModel's
Options, mirroring tool_parser/reasoning_parser) must ride along as
sampling_params['custom_params']['thinking_budget'] on every
request — that's the only field sglang's --enable-strict-thinking
grammar backend reads to bound the reasoning length."""
from types import SimpleNamespace
servicer = self._servicer()
servicer.thinking_budget = 512
request = SimpleNamespace(
Temperature=0.7, N=0, PresencePenalty=0, FrequencyPenalty=0,
RepetitionPenalty=0, TopP=0, TopK=0, MinP=0, Seed=0,
StopPrompts=[], StopTokenIds=[], IgnoreEOS=False, Tokens=0,
MinTokens=0, SkipSpecialTokens=False, Grammar="",
)
params = servicer._build_sampling_params(request)
self.assertEqual(params["custom_params"], {"thinking_budget": 512})
def test_no_thinking_budget_means_no_custom_params_key(self):
"""Unconfigured is unconfigured: no thinking_budget option must not
add an empty/None custom_params that could clobber a sglang-side
--preferred-sampling-params default (see sglang#40634)."""
from types import SimpleNamespace
servicer = self._servicer()
request = SimpleNamespace(
Temperature=0.7, N=0, PresencePenalty=0, FrequencyPenalty=0,
RepetitionPenalty=0, TopP=0, TopK=0, MinP=0, Seed=0,
StopPrompts=[], StopTokenIds=[], IgnoreEOS=False, Tokens=0,
MinTokens=0, SkipSpecialTokens=False, Grammar="",
)
params = servicer._build_sampling_params(request)
self.assertNotIn("custom_params", params)
def test_thinking_budget_accepts_integral_spellings(self):
"""YAML options arrive as strings; "512" and "512.0" both mean 512."""
servicer = self._servicer()
self.assertEqual(servicer._parse_thinking_budget("512"), 512)
self.assertEqual(servicer._parse_thinking_budget("512.0"), 512)
self.assertEqual(servicer._parse_thinking_budget(" 64 "), 64)
self.assertEqual(servicer._parse_thinking_budget(256), 256)
def test_thinking_budget_unset_is_none(self):
servicer = self._servicer()
self.assertIsNone(servicer._parse_thinking_budget(None))
self.assertIsNone(servicer._parse_thinking_budget(""))
def test_thinking_budget_zero_and_negative_are_ignored(self):
"""No defined meaning in sglang -- ignored, not passed through."""
servicer = self._servicer()
self.assertIsNone(servicer._parse_thinking_budget("0"))
self.assertIsNone(servicer._parse_thinking_budget("-100"))
def test_thinking_budget_non_integer_does_not_raise(self):
"""A bad value must not crash LoadModel for the whole model."""
servicer = self._servicer()
self.assertIsNone(servicer._parse_thinking_budget("12.5"))
self.assertIsNone(servicer._parse_thinking_budget("lots"))
def test_warns_when_budget_set_without_strict_thinking(self):
servicer = self._servicer()
self.assertIn(
"enable_strict_thinking",
servicer._strict_thinking_warning(512, {"model_path": "x"}),
)
self.assertIsNone(servicer._strict_thinking_warning(512, {"enable_strict_thinking": True}))
self.assertIsNone(servicer._strict_thinking_warning(None, {}))
def test_explicit_zero_temperature_and_seed_are_preserved(self):
"""Temperature=0 is greedy decoding and 0 is a valid seed — neither is