The timeline set six 15rem columns in a flex row with overflow-x:auto, which
needs 90rem and so scrolled sideways on any normal laptop. It is a wrapping
grid now, and the rule that carries the dots moves from the container onto
each item so a wrapped row still gets a line above it. Column gap is zero and
the items carry their own right padding, so the rule stays continuous.
Integrations move from a card grid to a reel. Any single integration is a weak
signal and the whole moving line is the strong one, so the count is doing the
argument. It pauses on hover and on keyboard focus, since the names are links.
The list grows from 8 to 26: Open WebUI, Dify, LibreChat, RAGFlow, Continue,
big-AGI, Nextcloud, Frigate, promptfoo, Mods, TypingMind, baibot, k8sgpt-
operator and others. Each was admitted only after opening that project's own
repository or docs and reading the line that names LocalAI. The ones that
failed that test are listed in the data file so nobody re-adds them.
The blog cards were hand-written, which is how one of them came to advertise
"Porting vLLM to C++", a post that does not exist, and how all three linked to
the blog index instead of an article. They range over the posts now.
The section intro used the "a changelog tells you what moved, these posts show
you what it does" shape, which is the standard machine-written antithesis. It
states what the posts contain instead, including the perplexity regression
that APEX costs, because publishing the price is the actual claim.
Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
Assisted-by: Claude Code:claude-opus-5[1m]
The band led with three sentences of hedging and printed a commit count
next to each employer, so a one-commit entry beside a large name read as
weakness rather than as the modest, true claim it was. It now opens on the
contributor count, sets the employers as a sentence instead of a pill wall,
and keeps the caveat to one line. The counts stay in ecosystem.yaml, since
they are the provenance for the list and anyone re-checking it needs them.
Two "coverage" cards were not about this project. The modelslab.com piece
reviews Frikallo/parakeet.cpp, an unrelated project of the same name, and
the snailtext.app benchmark measures Parakeet through ONNX Runtime without
mentioning LocalAI at all. Both are removed, along with the contributor
card that duplicated the band's opening line.
Press was four posts from one vendor, which read as the whole of the
coverage rather than one enthusiastic outlet. SUSE collapses to a single
series entry, and Pulumi, Semaphore and Spectro Cloud join it. Each was
opened and checked against the project before being added. K8sGPT and
LlamaIndex join the integrations; both document LocalAI as a backend.
The quotes move above the lists so the section opens on its strongest
line, which is somebody else's. The hero gains a GitHub call to action,
the APEX collection link was returning 404 and is corrected, and the
footer no longer describes the site as a design mock.
Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
Assisted-by: Claude Code:claude-opus-5[1m]
Adds the "who turns up around this project" section, split into three lists
because the evidence behind each one is a different strength and collapsing
them into a single logo wall would overclaim.
Contributors 21 companies whose engineers have commits here. Evidence is
the commit history plus the employer on that person's public
GitHub profile, so it is a claim about the person. Commit
counts are shown next to each name, including the ones that
are a single patch, because hiding that would be the whole
problem.
Integrations six projects that reference LocalAI in their own repository
or documentation, which anyone can verify without asking us.
Press four SUSE Communities articles about running LocalAI.
Names are set in type rather than fetched as logos. A logo reads as
endorsement, and a one-line typo fix from somebody who happens to work at a
large company does not support that, quite apart from what their trademark
policy says about it.
ADOPTERS.md is the mechanism for the stronger claim. An organisation that
wants to be listed as a user opens a pull request adding itself, which is both
the evidence and the permission, and is publicly auditable afterwards. The
file says plainly what the website does and does not claim, so the next person
to ask "can we add some big names" has the answer in the repository.
Assisted-by: Claude Code:claude-opus-5 [Bash] [Edit] [Write] [WebSearch]
Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
Co-authored-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
