Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ettore Di Giacinto
62f0ae17e3 docs(paged): upstream survey - no FP4 MoE GEMM to patch in; phase 3 is from-scratch
No tcgen05/CUTLASS grouped-GEMM MoE kernel exists upstream (merged/in-flight/
draft); CUTLASS not a dep; no fork has one; activation-quant gather already
fused. Matching vLLM needs a from-scratch tcgen05 grouped GEMM (months,
maintainers deferring to cuTile). No tractable patch closes the 27x.

Assisted-by: Claude:opus-4.8 [Claude Code]
Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
2026-06-19 22:44:11 +00:00
Ettore Di Giacinto
b14214620c docs(paged): Lever-3 phase-1 nwarps tweak = dead end (constants coupled)
static_assert(nwarps*tile_C::I == mmq_y) locks nwarps=8 for mmq_y=128; can't
raise occupancy without co-scaling mmq_y (blows Blackwell smem). MMQ kernel is
not freely tunable -> parity needs the tcgen05/CUTLASS rewrite, not knobs.

Assisted-by: Claude:opus-4.8 [Claude Code]
Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
2026-06-19 22:32:02 +00:00
Ettore Di Giacinto
1449b806ab docs(paged): Lever-3 + paged-attention implementation plans + upstream ggml issue draft
Plan A (Lever 3): phased path to FP4 MoE GEMM parity — cheap tweaks, act-quant
fusion, then the real lever (tcgen05/CUTLASS grouped GEMM), full-model FP4.
Plan B (paged attention): on-demand pool, gather-read + Gate 0, continuous
batching, prefix sharing; benchmark in memory-pressured/mixed-length regimes.
Upstream issue draft: GB10 numbers, nsys profile, ruled-out config knobs,
tcgen05 proposal.

Assisted-by: Claude:opus-4.8 [Claude Code]
Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
2026-06-19 22:28:28 +00:00
Ettore Di Giacinto
9f16a907be docs(paged): Lever 3 profiled + Q4/MXFP4 findings, auto-ubatch shipped
Prefill doesn't scale with bigger single prompts (attention O(N^2)); real gap
is batched MoE prefill (B=32: 27x vs vLLM, ~22 effective TFLOP/s). nsys pins
Lever 3 target: mul_mat_q<MXFP4> MoE GEMM 37% + un-fused act-quant 8%; native
FP4 MMA already engaged, inefficiency is the per-expert thin-tile scheduler.
Q4_K_M matches MXFP4 on decode (decode win is generic 4-bit); MXFP4's only edge
is prefill. Auto-ubatch=2048 on Blackwell shipped (PR #10411).

Assisted-by: Claude:opus-4.8 [Claude Code]
Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
2026-06-19 20:56:46 +00:00
Ettore Di Giacinto
aba0bfd24f feat(backend): auto-default physical batch to 2048 on Blackwell GPUs
On NVIDIA Blackwell consumer GPUs (sm_120/121, incl. GB10/DGX Spark) a larger
physical batch (n_ubatch) materially lifts MoE prefill throughput - measured on
a GB10 with Qwen3-30B-A3B to lift the prefill ceiling and saturate at ~2048.

When a model config leaves `batch:` unset, EffectiveBatchSize now picks 2048 on
Blackwell instead of 512; explicit `batch:` always overrides. Detection is a
shared, cached Go helper (xsysinfo.IsNVIDIABlackwell, nvidia-smi compute_cap
>= 12). Logic is isolated in core/backend/hardware_defaults.go and applied at
the common ModelOptions builder, so it covers the C++ llama.cpp backend too.

Measured (GB10, Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B MXFP4): prefill ub512 2994 -> ub2048 3316
t/s; saturates past 2048. Also recorded in the DGX gap plan: 4-bit quant alone
captures the decode win (Q4_K_M 93.5 >= MXFP4 86.4 t/s), MXFP4's only edge is
prefill via Blackwell FP4 tensor cores.

Tests: hardware_defaults_internal_test.go; existing NBatch specs pinned to the
no-Blackwell branch for determinism.

Assisted-by: Claude:opus-4.8 [Claude Code]
Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
2026-06-19 20:46:45 +00:00
Ettore Di Giacinto
7aa61d4c32 docs(paged): DGX Blackwell gap analysis + lever plan (living doc)
Captures the full dgx.casa investigation: Q8/F16/vLLM baselines, concurrency
sweeps, paged-patch (no concurrency effect), nsys+code root-cause (MoE int8
MMQ on Ampere-class tensor cores = 74.5% compute, no FP8 path), and the
lever plan.

Measured wins:
- Lever 1 (MXFP4 / Blackwell FP4 path): decode +50-66% over Q8, prefill
  plateau +66% (2200->3650). MXFP4 decode beats vLLM FP8 at B=1 (83 vs 48),
  near-parity B=8. Prefill still plateaus (fused-MoE-GEMM gap).
- Lever 2 (ubatch): saturates at 2048; ceiling is the kernel, not batch.

Designed (not built): Lever 3 fused FP4/FP8 MoE grouped GEMM, Lever 4 FP8
GEMM (needs ggml_mul_mat_ext scale plumbing), Lever 5 tcgen05 kernels, and
the complete paged attention (on-demand alloc + gather-read + continuous
batching + prefix sharing). Honest scope: each is multi-week kernel/systems
work.

Assisted-by: Claude:opus-4.8 [Claude Code]
Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
2026-06-19 20:15:14 +00:00