Files
LocalAI/backend/cpp/llama-cpp
Ettore Di Giacinto 1887385b79 analysis: MXFP4-dense fails quality check (~27% worse PPL than Q4_K) - do not recommend
Clean fair comparison (Qwen3-4B, all from same BF16 source, wikitext PPL): BF16
13.32, Q4_K_M 13.66 (+2.6%, near-lossless), MXFP4 17.42 (+30.8%). MXFP4 is ~27%
worse than Q4_K even clean from BF16 (32B double-quant cross-check: 7.39 vs 8.46,
+14.6%, same direction). MXFP4_MOE is built for MoE expert tensors; on dense
attn/ffn it is far lossier than Q4_K's 6-bit superblock structure. The ~1.58x
prefill is not worth ~27% PPL - Q4_K stays the dense default; FP4 only where the
model is trained for it (MoE). Verdict: do NOT ship a Blackwell MXFP4-dense rec.

Assisted-by: Claude:opus-4.8 [Claude Code]
Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
2026-06-21 17:24:24 +00:00
..
2026-04-12 08:51:30 +02:00