mirror of
https://github.com/mudler/LocalAI.git
synced 2026-09-13 06:45:26 -04:00
Ettore Di Giacinto
c19ed5ab32
Making a worker's refusal reaping evidence created a defect one layer along, at the producer. The worker refused a ReadStreamRequest failure with ErrStreamRequestInvalid and its own comment said "Includes the deadline above expiring", which was harmless while every refusal reached the frontend as "no route" and became a reap the moment one of them did not. So a request frame that had merely not ARRIVED yet was reported as a non-transient verdict about a backend. It is reachable on the relay path, which carries most production traffic: the worker's header timer starts when the OWNING replica opens the stream, while the frame is written by the DIALLING replica only after the relay's acceptance travels back to it, so a whole peer-link round trip runs inside that window, on a link this design deliberately loads with multi-gigabyte artifacts beside token streams. For a long-deadline caller the endpoint is ConnectionEvictingClient, which stops the model across the fleet. It also falsified the "neither clears on its own" argument that licensed the reap. There is now a fourth refusal, ErrStreamNotServed, for what a worker could not serve for a reason of its OWN. It is deliberately outside IsWorkerAnswer, so it reaches a consumer under the no-route umbrella and reaps nothing, which is the same treatment an unrecognised code already gets. Four producers move onto it: a request frame that timed out (a malformed one stays a verdict, because that is a frontend bug no retry fixes), both SetReadDeadline failures, which are facts about the stream and not about a target nothing has dialled yet, and WriteStreamRefusal's default for a reason nobody classified. classifyServiceFailure keeps ErrStreamTargetUnavailable as its default on purpose: inverting it would make errno enumeration the single point of failure for the reap, and a miss there is a row nothing can ever delete. What it gains is a deny-list of two causes that are provably this worker's own clock or its own context. Also: - The read-site caller-deadline guard in the handshake was unpinned: the existing seam spends the budget before the handshake starts, so only the write could ever fail. A spec whose deadline falls between the request and the reply pins it, and each guard now reddens on its own. - The documented worker-first failure line omitted the JSON error envelope the old frontend returns, so an operator grepping it found nothing. - The peer-link disclosure names the aimable per-session receive window in all four places, and LastDialErrorOf records why a third consumer must go through IsWorkerAnswer rather than roll its own list. Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5 [claude-code] Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>