Commit Graph

987 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Don Cross
a6ddf1880a C#: implemented user-defined stars. 2022-11-22 15:06:04 -05:00
Don Cross
f6ad8b5b26 C: Find rise/set/culm of user-defined stars.
SearchRiseSet and SearchHourAngle now work with user-defined stars.

Fixed a bug in InternalSearchAltitude where I failed to return an error
code when its call to MaxAltitudeSlope failed.
2022-11-22 05:46:50 -05:00
Don Cross
6b4c6c67e2 C: Added Astronomy_DefineStar.
Beginning to add support in C for user-defined stars.
2022-11-21 22:16:30 -05:00
Don Cross
696efe8649 JS: Find rise/set/culm of user-defined stars.
DefineStar now requires passing in the heliocentric
distance of the star expressed in light-years.
That way, I can directly support returning vectors
to a star from HelioVector, GeoVector, etc.

SearchRiseSet and SearchHourAngle now work with user-defined stars.
2022-11-21 20:55:27 -05:00
Don Cross
84d6aff35a JS: Added function DefineStar.
I'm starting to implement the ability to define
up to 8 distinct points in the sky as "stars"
that will be allowed as a `body` parameter to
some Astronomy Engine functions, to be determined.
2022-11-21 12:53:45 -05:00
Don Cross
351e997a2f Merge branch 'riseset_poles'
Fixed issues with finding rise/set events near the
Earth's poles. Avoid assumptions that rise/set is
tied to hour angles.
2022-11-14 12:05:20 -05:00
Don Cross
d9d955a651 Altitude search: better parameter checking.
Made sure all the altitude search functions
verify that the geographic latitude and target altitude
are valid numbers in the range [-90, +90].

Reworked the C version of the code to be clearer:
eliminated goofy ALTDIFF macro, split out max
altitude derivative into its own function MaxAltitudeSlope,
just like the other language implementations do.

Minor rewording of comments in MaxAltitudeSlope functions.

Python InvalidBodyError now includes the invalid body
in the diagnostic message.
2022-11-14 11:04:46 -05:00
Don Cross
1b52e91394 Python: overhauled altitude search 2022-11-13 22:17:06 -05:00
Don Cross
e85863acf5 JS: reworked rise/set to work in polar regions 2022-11-13 20:45:00 -05:00
Don Cross
e31be80497 Kotlin: reworked rise/set to work in polar regions 2022-11-13 19:25:44 -05:00
Don Cross
480e0c3ab5 C#: Overhauled altitude search for polar regions.
The C# version of the altitude searches now work correctly
near the Earth's poles. This is a port of the C version.
Cleaned up a little code in the C version.
2022-11-13 12:25:10 -05:00
Don Cross
a5995e2ee0 C RiseSet: improved efficiency.
Do not recurse deeper when any solution would
have a rise+set or a set+rise consecutively
within one second. This would risk confusing the
search, which has a 0.1 second tolerance for convergence.
For practical reasons, such events are dubious anyway,
being swamped by unpredictable atmospheric refraction.
Plus it's just faster to not have to recurse so deeply.

Add a safety valve that fails the search if recursion
gets deeper than the above tolerance would ever allow
to happen in the first place.

This change improves performance significantly:

C RiseSet: passed 5909 lines: time errors in minutes: rms=0.2904, max=1.1541, recur=15, altcount=156881

Added helper function AscentError for cleaner code in error cases.
2022-11-13 10:32:47 -05:00
Don Cross
8498d23c73 C RiseSet: print performance stats.
Track the maximum recursion depth in FindAscent.
Count the number of times the altitude_diff function is called.
These are important performance statistics that I want to
measure, so I can try a few optimization ideas.

Current results:

don@spearmint:~/github/astronomy/generate $ ./generate source && ./ctbuild && ./ctest -v riseset
./ctbuild: C compiler = gcc
./ctbuild: Built 'ctest' program.
C RiseSet: Moon    lat=-61.0 lon=103.0
C RiseSet: Moon    lat=-45.0 lon=150.0
C RiseSet: Moon    lat=29.0 lon=-81.0
C RiseSet: Moon    lat=80.0 lon=130.0
C RiseSet: Moon    lat=83.0 lon=105.0
C RiseSet: Moon    lat=84.0 lon=125.0
C RiseSet: Moon    lat=85.0 lon=135.0
C RiseSet: Moon    lat=85.0 lon=140.0
C RiseSet: Sun     lat=-90.0 lon=0.0
C RiseSet: Sun     lat=-88.0 lon=45.0
C RiseSet: Sun     lat=-60.0 lon=-150.0
C RiseSet: Sun     lat=15.0 lon=75.0
C RiseSet: Sun     lat=29.0 lon=-81.0
C RiseSet: Sun     lat=60.0 lon=0.0
C RiseSet: Sun     lat=89.0 lon=30.0
C RiseSet: Sun     lat=90.0 lon=0.0
C RiseSet: passed 5909 lines: time errors in minutes: rms=0.2904, max=1.1541, recur=19, altcount=171438
2022-11-13 09:36:48 -05:00
Don Cross
bfc7c80309 C: Cleanup of new function FindAscent(). 2022-11-12 21:52:38 -05:00
Don Cross
4602f619d3 C: Rise/set that works near the poles!
This is a whole new algorithm that efficiently finds
all rise/set events, even near the poles.
It uses a recursive bisection search that limits
recursion depth by knowing the maximum possible
|da/dt| = change in altitude with respect to time.
2022-11-12 21:40:20 -05:00
Don Cross
eede908314 Arcsine of (radius/dist) for more accuracy.
Finding apparent angular radius by dividing body radius
by distance is not quite as accurate as taking the
arcsine of the same ratio. Changed this for a slightly
more accurate answer.
2022-11-10 15:20:04 -05:00
Don Cross
bf20fb1c44 C: InternalSearchAltitude owns func + context.
Refactored so there is a single altitude function/context pair
instead of separate ones for SearchAltitude and SearchRiseSet.
This allows InternalSearchAltitude to fully understand the
problem to be solved, and also makes the code smaller.
InternalSearchAltitude will need to perform min/max altitude
calculations, which means it needs to know all the parameters
of the altitude search directly. They are no longer hidden
inside an opaque function pointer and context.

So now SearchAltitude and SearchRiseSet no longer create
contexts, nor pass in a function pointer. They just
pass the correct numeric parameters to the generic solver
InternalSearchAltitude, which packs the parameters into
the context for Search().

Unified the two context types into a single context type,
and the two callback functions into a single callback function.
2022-11-10 15:10:28 -05:00
Don Cross
5eca7d7760 CodeQL tweaks and fixes.
Updated CodeQL config to ignore source templates,
because they are not syntactically valid source code.
Ignore other stuff that is irrelevant to published
code quality.

Made various fixes based on helpful CodeQL analysis.
2022-11-07 15:31:05 -05:00
Don Cross
0674d69237 C RiseSet: starting algorithm without hour angles.
The rise/set search based on hour angles is complicated,
and doesn't handle oddities that happen close to the poles.
I'm starting to rework rise/set as a more brute force solution
that iterates through finite time steps.

I also added a series of Moon data for the arctic circle,
which includes some of the more painful special cases.
For example:

Moon  130  80 2034-05-16T13:21Z s
Moon  130  80 2034-05-16T13:51Z r

Here the Moon sets, then rises 30 minutes later.
So now I'm trying to figure out how to discover
arbitrarily brief intervals like this.
I want the time increments to scale intelligently
so that we don't waste time during long periods
of inactivity (body above or below the horizon continuously),
but without missing examples like the one above.
2022-11-05 20:58:04 -04:00
Don Cross
275e3a7c79 Kotlin: added function planetOrbitalPeriod. 2022-11-01 19:16:32 -04:00
Don Cross
23fd95a53f PY: Added PlanetOrbitalPeriod function. 2022-11-01 17:30:48 -04:00
Don Cross
fd49c25ae3 C#: exported function PlanetOrbitalPeriod. 2022-11-01 17:01:03 -04:00
Don Cross
bd115770e1 C: Added function Astronomy_PlanetOrbitalPeriod. 2022-11-01 16:38:57 -04:00
Don Cross
9e4fbecf55 JS: added OrbitalPeriod function. 2022-11-01 16:09:14 -04:00
Don Cross
06b62887d2 Kotlin: obscuration for solar, lunar eclipses. 2022-10-20 17:31:21 -04:00
Don Cross
678866af02 C: define MOON_POLAR_RADIUS_AU for consistency 2022-10-20 13:07:02 -04:00
Don Cross
393f134c49 PY: solar eclipse obscuration
Also fixed missing improvements to C# PlanetShadow().
2022-10-20 12:32:11 -04:00
Don Cross
a90edfed0d PY: lunar eclipse obscuration 2022-10-19 20:44:22 -04:00
Don Cross
223b75a69a JS: solar eclipse obscuration. 2022-10-19 16:47:33 -04:00
Don Cross
f6c5bd0bba JS: lunar eclipse obscuration 2022-10-19 14:37:21 -04:00
Don Cross
f7787caf98 C#: solar eclipse obscuration and accuracy enhancements 2022-10-18 20:09:59 -04:00
Don Cross
c798c5015d C#: lunar eclipse obscuration 2022-10-18 16:21:15 -04:00
Don Cross
c53b8b8dd5 C: more accurate Sun positions for lunar eclipses, transits.
For consistency, I now calculate the Sun's apparent position
correcting for aberration, for lunar eclipses and transits.
This didn't make much difference for accuracy.

Before correcting for Sun aberration:

$ ./ctest transit
C TransitFile(eclipse/mercury.txt ): PASS - verified 94, max minutes = 10.709, max sep arcmin = 0.2120
C TransitFile(eclipse/venus.txt   ): PASS - verified 30, max minutes =  9.108, max sep arcmin = 0.6772

$ ./ctest -v lunar_fraction
C LunarFractionCase(2010-06-26) fraction error = 0.00900991
C LunarFractionCase(2012-06-04) fraction error = 0.00491535
C LunarFractionCase(2013-04-25) fraction error = 0.00143039
C LunarFractionCase(2017-08-07) fraction error = 0.00682336
C LunarFractionCase(2019-07-16) fraction error = 0.00572727
C LunarFractionCase(2021-11-19) fraction error = 0.00350680
C LunarFractionCase(2023-10-28) fraction error = 0.00370518
C LunarFractionCase(2024-09-18) fraction error = 0.00429906
C LunarFractionCase(2026-08-28) fraction error = 0.00322697
C LunarFractionCase(2028-01-12) fraction error = 0.00405870
C LunarFractionCase(2028-07-06) fraction error = 0.00857840
C LunarFractionCase(2030-06-15) fraction error = 0.00557106
C LunarFractionTest: PASS

After correcting for Sun aberration:

$ ./ctest transit
C TransitFile(eclipse/mercury.txt ): PASS - verified 94, max minutes = 10.709, max sep arcmin = 0.2120
C TransitFile(eclipse/venus.txt   ): PASS - verified 30, max minutes =  9.108, max sep arcmin = 0.6772

$ ./ctest -v lunar_fraction
C LunarFractionCase(2010-06-26) fraction error = 0.00762932
C LunarFractionCase(2012-06-04) fraction error = 0.00606322
C LunarFractionCase(2013-04-25) fraction error = 0.00111560
C LunarFractionCase(2017-08-07) fraction error = 0.00571542
C LunarFractionCase(2019-07-16) fraction error = 0.00713913
C LunarFractionCase(2021-11-19) fraction error = 0.00298979
C LunarFractionCase(2023-10-28) fraction error = 0.00448445
C LunarFractionCase(2024-09-18) fraction error = 0.00367044
C LunarFractionCase(2026-08-28) fraction error = 0.00405559
C LunarFractionCase(2028-01-12) fraction error = 0.00347340
C LunarFractionCase(2028-07-06) fraction error = 0.00729982
C LunarFractionCase(2030-06-15) fraction error = 0.00680776
C LunarFractionTest: PASS
2022-10-18 13:32:07 -04:00
Don Cross
b4f7f2c8a3 C: more accurate Sun positions for solar eclipses
I wondered why my obscuration numbers were less accurate
for partial eclipses than for annular eclipses.
I considered that the obscuration for an annular eclipse
is not sensitive to the relative positions of the Sun
and Moon, but it is for a partial eclipse.

Looking at the functions MoonShadow and LocalMoonShadow, I realized
that I was not correcting the Sun's position for aberration.
After fixing that, obscuration values are much more in
agreement with authoritative sources.

Soon I will study the same issue that exists in EarthShadow,
used for lunar eclipse calculations, and PlanetShadow,
used for transits.

Before correcting for Sun aberration:

C GlobalAnnularCase(2023-10-14) obscuration error = 0.00009036, expected = 0.90638000, calculated = 0.90647036
C GlobalAnnularCase(2024-10-02) obscuration error = 0.00005246, expected = 0.86975000, calculated = 0.86980246
C GlobalAnnularCase(2027-02-06) obscuration error = 0.00007237, expected = 0.86139000, calculated = 0.86146237
C GlobalAnnularCase(2028-01-26) obscuration error = 0.00003656, expected = 0.84787000, calculated = 0.84790656
C GlobalAnnularCase(2030-06-01) obscuration error = 0.00008605, expected = 0.89163000, calculated = 0.89171605
C LocalSolarCase(2023-10-14) obscuration diff =  0.00006323, expected =  0.90638000, calculated =  0.90644323
C LocalSolarCase(2023-10-14) obscuration diff = -0.00521043, expected =  0.57800000, calculated =  0.57278957
C LocalSolarCase(2023-10-14) obscuration diff = -0.00542845, expected =  0.88670000, calculated =  0.88127155
C LocalSolarCase(2024-04-08) obscuration diff =  0.00000000, expected =  1.00000000, calculated =  1.00000000
C LocalSolarCase(2024-04-08) obscuration diff =  0.00304558, expected =  0.34000000, calculated =  0.34304558
C LocalSolarCase(2024-10-02) obscuration diff =  0.00007858, expected =  0.86975000, calculated =  0.86982858
C LocalSolarCase(2024-10-02) obscuration diff = -0.00343797, expected =  0.43600000, calculated =  0.43256203
C LocalSolarCase(2030-06-01) obscuration diff =  0.00007259, expected =  0.89163000, calculated =  0.89170259
C LocalSolarCase(2030-06-01) obscuration diff = -0.00059871, expected =  0.67240000, calculated =  0.67180129
C LocalSolarCase(2030-06-01) obscuration diff = -0.00146303, expected =  0.67360000, calculated =  0.67213697
C SolarFractionTest: PASS

After correcting for Sun aberration:

C GlobalAnnularCase(2023-10-14) obscuration error = 0.00007930, expected = 0.90638000, calculated = 0.90645930
C GlobalAnnularCase(2024-10-02) obscuration error = 0.00006221, expected = 0.86975000, calculated = 0.86981221
C GlobalAnnularCase(2027-02-06) obscuration error = 0.00006058, expected = 0.86139000, calculated = 0.86145058
C GlobalAnnularCase(2028-01-26) obscuration error = 0.00004560, expected = 0.84787000, calculated = 0.84791560
C GlobalAnnularCase(2030-06-01) obscuration error = 0.00007078, expected = 0.89163000, calculated = 0.89170078
C LocalSolarCase(2023-10-14) obscuration diff =  0.00007997, expected =  0.90638000, calculated =  0.90645997
C LocalSolarCase(2023-10-14) obscuration diff =  0.00002298, expected =  0.57800000, calculated =  0.57802298
C LocalSolarCase(2023-10-14) obscuration diff = -0.00101535, expected =  0.88670000, calculated =  0.88568465
C LocalSolarCase(2024-04-08) obscuration diff =  0.00000000, expected =  1.00000000, calculated =  1.00000000
C LocalSolarCase(2024-04-08) obscuration diff = -0.00060338, expected =  0.34000000, calculated =  0.33939662
C LocalSolarCase(2024-10-02) obscuration diff =  0.00006096, expected =  0.86975000, calculated =  0.86981096
C LocalSolarCase(2024-10-02) obscuration diff = -0.00097934, expected =  0.43600000, calculated =  0.43502066
C LocalSolarCase(2030-06-01) obscuration diff =  0.00006606, expected =  0.89163000, calculated =  0.89169606
C LocalSolarCase(2030-06-01) obscuration diff =  0.00019620, expected =  0.67240000, calculated =  0.67259620
C LocalSolarCase(2030-06-01) obscuration diff = -0.00066619, expected =  0.67360000, calculated =  0.67293381
C SolarFractionTest: PASS
2022-10-18 12:34:25 -04:00
Don Cross
35936761f7 C: local solar eclipse obscuration
C function Astronomy_SearchLocalSolarEclipse now reports
obscuration for the peak of a solar eclipse seen at a given location.
Some of the test data from aa.usno.navy.mil looks suspiciously inaccurate.
I am finding better agreement with Fred Espenak's eclipsewise.com and
Xavier M. Jubier's xjubier.free.fr online calculators.
The larger obscuration differences are from aa.usno.navy.mil:

don@spearmint:~/github/astronomy/generate $ ./ctest -v solar_fraction
C GlobalAnnularCase(2023-10-14) obscuration error = 0.00009036, expected = 0.90638000, calculated = 0.90647036
C GlobalAnnularCase(2024-10-02) obscuration error = 0.00005246, expected = 0.86975000, calculated = 0.86980246
C GlobalAnnularCase(2027-02-06) obscuration error = 0.00007237, expected = 0.86139000, calculated = 0.86146237
C GlobalAnnularCase(2028-01-26) obscuration error = 0.00003656, expected = 0.84787000, calculated = 0.84790656
C GlobalAnnularCase(2030-06-01) obscuration error = 0.00008605, expected = 0.89163000, calculated = 0.89171605
C LocalSolarCase(2023-10-14) obscuration diff = 0.00006323, expected = 0.90638000, calculated = 0.90644323
C LocalSolarCase(2023-10-14) obscuration diff = -0.00521043, expected = 0.57800000, calculated = 0.57278957
C LocalSolarCase(2024-04-08) obscuration diff = 0.00000000, expected = 1.00000000, calculated = 1.00000000
C LocalSolarCase(2024-04-08) obscuration diff = 0.00304558, expected = 0.34000000, calculated = 0.34304558
C LocalSolarCase(2024-10-02) obscuration diff = 0.00007858, expected = 0.86975000, calculated = 0.86982858
C LocalSolarCase(2024-10-02) obscuration diff = -0.00343797, expected = 0.43600000, calculated = 0.43256203
C LocalSolarCase(2030-06-01) obscuration diff = 0.00007259, expected = 0.89163000, calculated = 0.89170259
C LocalSolarCase(2030-06-01) obscuration diff = -0.00059871, expected = 0.67240000, calculated = 0.67180129
C SolarFractionTest: PASS

I am going to rework using xjubier.free.fr in a subsequent commit.
2022-10-18 10:29:13 -04:00
Don Cross
14b881e0d9 C: global solar eclipse obscuration
Fixed bug in internal C function Obscuration().
It was not calculating obscuration correctly when
the second disc is completely inside the first disc,
i.e. the annular solar eclipse case.

Added C/C++ calculation of obscuration for global solar
eclipses that are total or annular at their peak
location and time. Obscuration is not calculated
for partial solar eclipses by SearchGlobalSolarEclipse.

Soon SearchLocalSolarEclipse will calculate obscuration
for partial solar eclipses at the geographic location
provided by the caller.
2022-10-17 16:31:05 -04:00
Don Cross
82be64ab2a C: lunar eclipse obscuration
Starting to add support for calculating the intensity
of lunar eclipses and solar eclipses in terms of "obscuration".

This commit adds calculation of obscuration for lunar eclipses
in C/C++. The structure returned by SearchLunarEclipse and
NextLunarEclipse now includes an `obscuration` field whose value
is in the range [0, 1], indicating what fraction of the Moon's
apparent disc is covered by the Earth's umbra at the eclipse's peak.
2022-10-17 11:25:10 -04:00
Don Cross
fde4c2c068 Kotlin: format dates for extreme year values. 2022-10-06 17:52:29 -04:00
Don Cross
1e95f0656b C, C#, Python: Support formatting calendar years -999999 to +999999. 2022-10-06 16:28:55 -04:00
Don Cross
a50436b535 C: Support formatting calendar years -999999 to +999999. 2022-10-06 15:29:24 -04:00
Don Cross
409e490728 Python: No longer limited to years 0000..9999.
I ported the NOVAS C 3.1 functions julian_date and cal_date to Python,
and removed the dependence on the standard datetime class for calculating UT.
Now we can create Time objects for a much wider range of year values.

Simplified the julian_date formula in C and C#.

In the Python version, I had to account for a difference
in the way integer division works for negative numbers.
In Python, integer division always rounds down, not toward
zero like it does in C/C#. So I reworked the formulas to
avoid dividing a negative integer (month-14), dividing the
positive quantity (14-month) instead and toggling addition
of the term with subtraction of the term.

I use the reworked (14-month) version in C and C# for consistency.
Also, the formatting of the formula was wacky and didn't make sense,
so now it easier to read and understand.

The Python regex for parsing dates has been expanded to allow
years before 0 and after 9999.
Allow converting Python Time to string for years before 0 and after 9999.
2022-10-06 10:56:17 -04:00
Don Cross
1327730324 C# AstroTime no longer limited to years 0000..9999.
The .NET type System.DateTime is limited to the years 0000..9999.
The Astronomy Engine type AstroTime was using System.DateTime to
convert a (year, month, day, hour, minute, second) tuple into a
fractional day value. This caused an exception for years outside
the supported range 0000..9999.

I ported the NOVAS C 3.1 functions julian_date and cal_date to C#,
and removed the dependence on System.DateTime.
Now we can create AstroTime for a much wider range of year values.
Allow converting AstroTime to string for years before 0 and after 9999.
2022-10-05 14:20:14 -04:00
Don Cross
5000a26049 Use "//" comments in C# code.
Replaced all /* ... */ comments with // comments in C# code,
both the Astronomy Engine library and the unit tests.
2022-10-02 21:47:46 -04:00
Don Cross
b91b1d905f Python: Reverse chrono search for rise/set, hour angles.
The following Python functions now support searching
in forward or reverse chronological order:

    SearchRiseSet
    SearchAltitude
    SearchHourAngle

Made some minor performance improvements to the
other implementations: return sooner if we
go past time window.
2022-10-01 21:44:04 -04:00
Don Cross
c1759b081a Kotlin: Reverse chrono search for rise/set, hour angles.
The following Kotlin functions now support searching
in forward or reverse chronological order:

    searchRiseSet
    searchAltitude
    searchHourAngle
2022-10-01 11:26:03 -04:00
Don Cross
c2bded8605 JS: Reverse chrono search for rise/set, hour angles.
The following JavaScript functions now support searching
in forward or reverse chronological order:

    SearchRiseSet
    SearchAltitude
    SearchHourAngle
2022-09-29 04:33:34 -04:00
Don Cross
cd3013eac9 C#: Reverse chrono search for rise/set, hour angles.
The following C# functions now support searching
in forward or reverse chronological order:

    Astronomy.SearchRiseSet
    Astronomy.SearchAltitude
    Astronomy.SearchHourAngle

Also fixed places where I forgot to update documentation
for the corresponding changes to the C code.
2022-09-29 02:54:13 -04:00
Don Cross
e827c257b4 C: Reverse chrono search for rise/set, hour angles.
The following C functions now support searching
in forward or reverse chronological order:

    Astronomy_SearchRiseSet
    Astronomy_SearchAltitude
    Astronomy_SearchHourAngleEx

The function Astronomy_SearchHourAngleEx replaces
Astronomy_SearchHourAngle, adding a new `direction` parameter.
A #define for Astronomy_SearchHourAngle preserves backward
compatibility for older code.

Implementation notes:

Astronomy_SearchRiseSet and Astronomy_SearchAltitude used
to call a private function InternalSearchAltitude.
That function has been split into two functions:
BackwardSearchAltitude and ForwardSearchAltitude,
for searching both directions in time.

Fixed a bug where it was possible to report a successful
altitude event that went outside the time limit specified
by `limitDays`.
2022-09-28 17:31:35 -04:00
Don Cross
207b8e7f65 Removed incorrect comment in Python code. 2022-09-28 10:12:28 -04:00
Don Cross
add675ea09 C, TypeScript: code cleanup in Search function.
The quadratic interpolator used by `Search` was returning
an unused output: `x`. Search does not need this dimensionless
value; it only cares about the time solution `t` and the slope
of the function at `t`. Removed `x` from the return value
to make slightly smaller/faster code.
2022-09-27 17:14:36 -04:00