See this discussion:
https://github.com/cosinekitty/astronomy/issues/150
For the case of calculating a map, where each pixel
on the map represents a different location on the Earth,
it is more efficient to factor out expensive calculation
of sidereal times, assuming the entire map represents
some phenomenon at a single moment in time.
For example, to determine whether the Moon is visible
at different places on the Earth, the following
functions can be calculated across thousands of
different (lat, lon) geographic coordinates around
the world:
ObserverVector
Rotation_EQD_HOR
Before iterating over the map pixels, a program
can call GeoMoon, then convert EQJ coordinates to EQD.
Then by passing the same time value in a loop to
ObserverVector and Rotation_EQD_HOR, the program
can calculate a vector from the observer to the Moon
in EQD coordinates, then convert EQD to HOR.
The z-coordinate of the horizontal coordinates
determines whether the Moon is above or below the
observer's horizon at that point on the Earth.
This calculation pattern performed redundant
sidereal time calculations for each pixel on the map.
I changed the code for all 4 languages to cache
sidereal time so that it only needs to be calculated
once.
In the C version of Astronomy Engine, this resulted
in a speedup factor of about 2.3 in the above use case.
(See the function MapPerformanceTest in generate/ctest.c.)
The code generator was creating slightly different numeric
values for the Pluto state tables and the Jupiter rotation matrix.
I decreased the output precision by one decimal digit.
This should allow the code generator to produce identical
source code on both Linux and macOS.
The documentation for the Python function `SearchAltitude`
was missing a mention of the `altitude` parameter.
I searched for similar mistakes in Python, C#, and C,
having just completed the same exercise in the JavaScript code.
I also found several places where extraneous newlines
between the parameter documentation caused the Markdown
to be rendered incorrectly.
Now that Microsoft has officially released .NET 6,
I have upgraded the C# version of Astronomy Engine to use it.
No source code changes were needed. I just bumped the
version number in the project files, and targeted .NET 6
in the GitHub Actions continuous integration tests.
Fixed some obsolete wording in generate/README.md.
I'm concerned that a first-time visitor to the Astronomy Engine
repo on GitHub will get lost. I made it more obvious where to
quickly find the source code needed for a given language.
Fixed a few lingering issues in the documentation of
the C# version of the ObserverState function.
This completes the implementation across all 4 languages.
ObserverState calculates the position vector of a point
on the surface of the Earth, and the velocity vector
of that point, both relative to the center of the Earth.
Implemented the C# version of the ObserverState function.
This returns the geocentric position and velocity for
a point on the Earth's surface at a given time.
Now the Python version of Astronomy Engine supports calculating
the Earth/Moon Barycenter (EMB) state vector (position and velocity)
relative to the Earth's center (geocentric) or relative
to the Solar System Barycenter (SSB).
This completes support for this feature across C, C#, JavaScript, and Python.
The BaryState function did not support Pluto before.
Refactored the code so that the internal CalcPluto function
returns both the position and velocity, and its caller
can select from heliocentric or barycentric coordinates.
HelioVector asks for heliocentric coordinates and keeps
only the position vector. BaryState asks for barycentric
coordinates and returns both position and velocity.
I added test data for Pluto generated by JPL Horizons.
It turns out the Pluto system barycenter is the best fit
for TOP2013, presumably because Charon causes Pluto to
wobble quite a bit.
I also generated JPL Horizons test data for the Moon
and the Earth/Moon barycenter, anticipating that I will
support calculating their barycentric state vectors soon.
I had to increase the enforced size limit for minified
JavaScript from 100000 bytes to 120000 bytes.
I guess this is like raising the "debt ceiling".
Fixed a bug in Python unit tests: if "-v" verbose option
was specified, it was printing a summary line for every
single line of input, instead of a single summary after
processing the whole file, as was intended. This is one
of those Python whitespace indentation bugs!
I'm getting much better accuracy sticking with my original
gravity simulator, just with smaller time increments, than
I was with the Runge-Kutta 4 method. The PlutoStateTable
gets a bit larger (51 state vectors instead of 41), but the
accuracy is so much higher.
Removed the Runge-Kutta code because I won't be going back to it.
The Pluto gravity simulator constants now come from
a single source: pluto_gravsim.h. This will allow me
to experiment with the Pluto state table to get a better
compromise between size and accuracy.
The C and C# Illumination functions now return
a `phase_fraction` result to complement `phase_angle`.
This makes them consistent with the Python and JavaScript
versions.
All 4 languages have added a `diam_deg` field to the
structure returned by the Libration function.
It is the apparent angular diameter of the Moon as
seen from the center of the Earth, expressed in degrees.
Ported conversion to/from galactic coordinates to Python.
Added unit test for new Python code.
Updated documentation for all 4 supported languages.
Fixed mistakes in JavaScript function documentation.
Before making these changes, I had the following discrepancies
between the calculations made by the different programming
language implementations of Astronomy Engine:
C vs C#: 5.55112e-17, worst line number = 6
C vs JS: 2.78533e-12, worst line number = 196936
C vs PY: 1.52767e-12, worst line number = 159834
Now the results are:
Diffing calculations: C vs C#
ctest(Diff): Maximum numeric difference = 5.55112e-17, worst line number = 5
Diffing calculations: C vs JS
ctest(Diff): Maximum numeric difference = 1.02318e-12, worst line number = 133677
Diffing calculations: C vs PY
ctest(Diff): Maximum numeric difference = 5.68434e-14, worst line number = 49066
Diffing calculations: JS vs PY
ctest(Diff): Maximum numeric difference = 1.02318e-12, worst line number = 133677
Here is how I did this:
1. Use new constants HOUR2RAD, RAD2HOUR that directly convert between radians and sidereal hours.
This reduces tiny roundoff errors in the conversions.
2. In VSOP longitude calculations, keep clamping the angular sum to
the range [-2pi, +2pi], to prevent it from accumulating thousands
of radians. This reduces the accumulated error in the final result
before it is fed into trig functions.
The remaining discrepancies are largely because of an "azimuth amplification" effect:
When converting equatorial coordinates to horizontal coordinates, an object near
the zenith (or nadir) has an azimuth that is highly sensitive to the input
equatorial coordinates. A tiny change in right ascension (RA) can cause a much
larger change in azimuth.
I tracked down the RA discrepancy, and it is due to a different behavior
of the atan2 function in C and JavaScript. There are cases where the least
significant decimal digit is off by 1, as if due to a difference of opinion
about rounding policy.
My best thought is to go back and have a more nuanced diffcalc that
applies less strict tests for azimuth values than the other calculated values.
It seems like every other computed quantity is less sensitive, because solar
system bodies tend to stay away from "poles" of other angular coordinate
systems: their ecliptic latitudes and equatorial declinations are usually
reasonably close to zero. Therefore, right ascensions and ecliptic longitudes
are usually insensitive to changes in the cartesian coordinates they
are calculated from.
This change has no effect on client-facing behavior.
It just makes the internal data tables for the array of
constellation appear more compact in C, C#, and Python.
This is what the TypeScript/JavaScript code was already doing.
Now there are constants for the mean radii of Jupiter's
four major moons available in the C, C#, Python, and JavaScript
versions of Astronomy Engine.
Clarified that these are all mean radii.
Fixed some lingering "//" comments in the C code
(I want to keep ANSI C code as portable as possible.)
Now callers can create time objects from either UT (UT1/UTC civil time)
or ephemeris/dynamical Terrestrial Time (TT). The new TT functions
numerically solve to find the UT that produces the given TT based
on the Delta-T value at that UT. This is always a very fast
numerical convergence, because TT and UT are almost perfectly
linear over brief time windows.
I am starting the process of implementing calculation
of Jupiter's four largest moons: Io, Europa, Ganymede, Callisto.
This commit just contains constant declarations for the
equatorial, polar, and volumetric mean radii of Jupiter.
The positions of the moons will be related to the center
of Jupiter and be expressed in Jupiter equatorial radius units,
so I felt it would be good to give users a way to convert to
kilometers, which can in turn be converted to AU.
Use a private enumerated type to select which direction
the precession and nutation is to be done:
- from date to J2000
- from J2000 to date
Normalize the order of parameters to be consistent
between precession() and nutation(), and across languages.
Pass in AstroTime instead of a pair of floating point TT
values (one of which had to be 0).
Added TypeScript version of ObserverVector(),
but it has not yet been documented or tested.
It always seemed a little odd to have to pass in two
time values to the precession() function, when one of
them always had to be 0. I think the logic is clearer
now that I pass in an enum value to select whether I
want a forward transform or a backward transform.
It is cleaner that now I can just pass in an AstroTime.
Ported the ObserverVector function to C#, but it is not tested yet.
While doing that, I realized I needed a way to document newly public
constants DEG2RAD, RAD2DEG, and KM_PER_AU. This led to work
on the 'csdown' project that converts C# XML documentation
into Markdown format.
Then I realized a lot of code would be more elegant if
AstroVector had operator overloads for addition, subtraction,
and dot products.
This in turn required these operators to know which time value
to store in the AstroVector, which led to realizing that I
was sloppy in a lot of places and passed in null times.
So this whole commit contains a variety of unrelated topics,
which is something I don't usually do, but it felt
justified here while I'm in a refactoring mood.
Astronomy Engine used to use USNO historical and predictive tables,
along with linear interpolation, to calculate Delta-T values.
The problem with the USNO tables is, they did not work well outside
a few centuries around present day.
Later I replaced with Espenak & Meeus piecewise polynomials
that work over a much larger time span (thousands of years).
I just discovered there were still comments in the code referring
to the USNO models. I updated the ones I could find to reflect
the current truth about how the code works today.
This is technically a breaking change, but only for clients
that use the cartesian coordinates in an ecliptic coordinate
return type. Before now, the coordinates were just separate
floating-point members ex, ey, ez. Now they are a standard
vector type.
The purpose is to allow seamless interfacing with vector
rotation functions, and to be consistent with the equatorial
coordinate types.
