✨ Add support for Pydantic v1 and above 🎉 (#646)

* Make compatible with pydantic v1

* Remove unused import

* Remove unused ignores

* Update pydantic version

* Fix minor formatting issue

* ⏪ Revert removing iterate_in_threadpool

* ✨ Add backwards compatibility with Pydantic 0.32.2

with deprecation warnings

* ✅ Update tests to not break when using Pydantic < 1.0.0

* 📝 Update docs for Pydantic version 1.0.0

* 📌 Update Pydantic range version to support from 0.32.2

* 🎨 Format test imports

* ✨ Add support for Pydantic < 1.2 for populate_validators

* ✨ Add backwards compatibility for Pydantic < 1.2.0 with required fields

* 📌 Relax requirement for Pydantic to < 2.0.0 🎉 🚀

* 💚 Update pragma coverage for older Pydantic versions

docs/tutorial/extra-models.md

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ This is especially the case for user models, because:
 
 Here's a general idea of how the models could look like with their password fields and the places where they are used:
 
-```Python hl_lines="8 10 15 21 23 32 34 39 40"
+```Python hl_lines="7 9  14   20 22  27 28  31 32 33  38 39"
 {!./src/extra_models/tutorial001.py!}
 ```
 
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ All the data conversion, validation, documentation, etc. will still work as norm
 
 That way, we can declare just the differences between the models (with plaintext `password`, with `hashed_password` and without password):
 
-```Python hl_lines="8 14 15 18 19 22 23"
+```Python hl_lines="7  13 14  17 18  21 22"
 {!./src/extra_models/tutorial002.py!}
 ```