Correct the v12 guides from agent-skills.md through lockfile.md against pnpm/crates, and fix the same wrong text on the v11 twins where pnpm11 confirms it. Part of pnpm/tasks#191. Wrong claims (both versions): - configuring: the global auth file is auth.ini, not rc; list the npm_config_* exceptions (workspace dir, userconfig, URL-scoped auth). - config-dependencies: the hook import used an invalid ESM specifier. - docker: Example 3 ran fetch --prod and built without an offline install or pnpm-workspace.yaml. - errors: drop MISMATCHED_RELEASE_CHANNEL, describe INVALID_NODE_VERSION through nodeVersion, PEER_DEP_ISSUES needs strictPeerDependencies. - faq: no lockfile deletion after a readPackage hook, default store order, junctions depend on symlink privilege. - filtering: `!./lib` matches one project; use `!./lib/**`. - git branch lockfiles: every non [A-Za-z0-9_.-] character becomes `!`, the name is lowercased, merging deletes branch lockfiles, "or" patterns. - git-worktrees: remove the nonexistent worktree:new and shell/wt.sh. - global-packages: orphaned dirs are cleaned by add -g (and update -g in v12), not store prune; document that add -g replaces every group that contains the package. - how-peers-are-resolved: current peer directory names. - completion: built-in completion already covers --filter and scripts. - feature-comparison: broken JSR anchor. Wrong claims (v12 only): - cargo: cargo.indexUrl fails the parse, overrides apply to adding only, merge the duplicated Cargo index section into Registries. - global-virtual-store: pnx keeps its own virtual store (dlx part only; the global-install claims are left for a separate decision). - installation: the npm package installs on Node.js 18, only get-pnpm needs 22.13; trim unverified compatibility rows. Missing facts (v12): agent-skills group filtering and naming, catalogs (catalogs.default, pnx, --save-catalog, error codes), cargo recursive add, build-std, resolution keys, completion zsh/pwsh setup, config dependency location and error codes, include error codes, CI opt-outs and pnpm ci, finders on list, filtering settings and --no-fail-if-no-match, global install refusals, trust for npm-registry package managers, Rust shims, overrides link from aliases. Stale history (v12): drop v11/v10 version markers and "since v11" narration in continuous-integration, filtering, finders, git-worktrees, global-packages, global-virtual-store, how-peers-are-resolved, lockfile, completion, configuring. Review follow-up: the Node.js compatibility table keeps the pnpm 10 column; Docker Example 3 builds with all dependencies in a build stage and ships only production dependencies, with the pnpm-workspace.yaml caveat (both versions); catalogs keep the bare-path form; v11 global packages name `pnpm update -g` as cleaning orphans too; the cargo build-std note says when rust-src must be listed. Second review: build-std needs a non-empty list; the Docker fetch layer also depends on the project settings; branch lockfile names keep only ASCII characters; the conflict merge needs both sides to parse; Rust shims and package managers are default globalShims participants; pnpm self-update also cleans orphaned global groups; v12 pnpm login writes tokens to config.yaml; legacyDirFiltering keeps the subtree wording (the v12 mismatch is pnpm/tasks#196); the v12 Docker example copies the files that `include` names before pnpm fetch.
7.2 KiB
id, title
| id | title |
|---|---|
| faq | Frequently Asked Questions |
Why does my node_modules folder use disk space if packages are stored in a global store?
pnpm creates hard links from the global store to the project's node_modules
folders. Hard links point to the same place on the disk where the original
files are. So, for example, if you have foo in your project as a dependency
and it occupies 1MB of space, then it will look like it occupies 1MB of space in
the project's node_modules folder and the same amount of space in the global
store. However, that 1MB is the same space on the disk addressed from two
different locations. So in total foo occupies 1MB, not 2MB.
For more on this subject:
- Why do hard links seem to take the same space as the originals?
- A thread from the pnpm chat room
- An issue in the pnpm repo
Does it work on Windows?
Short answer: Yes. Long answer: Using symbolic linking on Windows can sometimes be problematic, however, pnpm has a workaround. When pnpm cannot create symlinks on Windows (no Developer Mode or admin rights), it uses junctions instead.
But the nested node_modules approach is incompatible with Windows?
Early versions of npm had issues because of nesting all node_modules (see
this issue). However, pnpm does not create deep folders, it stores all packages
flatly and uses symbolic links to create the dependency tree structure.
What about circular symlinks?
Although pnpm uses linking to put dependencies into node_modules folders,
circular symlinks are avoided because parent packages are placed into the same
node_modules folder in which their dependencies are. So foo's dependencies
are not in foo/node_modules, but foo is in node_modules together with its
own dependencies.
Why have hard links at all? Why not symlink directly to the global store?
One package can have different sets of dependencies on one machine.
In project A foo@1.0.0 can have a dependency resolved to bar@1.0.0, but
in project B the same dependency of foo might resolve to bar@1.1.0; so,
pnpm hard links foo@1.0.0 to every project where it is used, to
create different sets of dependencies for it.
Direct symlinking to the global store would work with Node's
--preserve-symlinks flag, however, that approach comes with a plethora of its
own issues, so we decided to stick with hard links. For more details about why
this decision was made, see this issue.
Does pnpm work across different subvolumes in one Btrfs partition?
While Btrfs does not allow cross-device hardlinks between different subvolumes in a single partition, it does permit reflinks. As a result, pnpm uses reflinks to share data between these subvolumes.
Does pnpm work across multiple drives or filesystems?
The package store should be on the same drive and filesystem as installations, otherwise packages will be copied, not linked. This is due to a limitation in how hard linking works, in that a file on one filesystem cannot address a location in another. See Issue #712 for more details.
pnpm functions differently in the 2 cases below:
Store path is specified
If the store path is specified via storeDir, then copying
occurs between the store and any projects that are on a different disk.
If you run pnpm install on disk A, then the pnpm store must be on disk A.
If the pnpm store is located on disk B, then all required packages will be
directly copied to the project location instead of being linked. This severely
inhibits the storage and performance benefits of pnpm.
Store path is NOT specified
If the store path is not set, then multiple stores are created (one per drive or filesystem).
pnpm uses <pnpm home>/store when the project can hardlink into it. Otherwise
it uses .pnpm-store at the root of the project's filesystem (the mount point),
or <project>/.pnpm-store as a last resort. If later the installation is run on
disk B, an independent store will be created on B. The
projects would still maintain the benefits of pnpm, but each drive may have
redundant packages.
What does pnpm stand for?
pnpm stands for performant npm.
@rstacruz came up with the name.
pnpm does not work with <YOUR-PROJECT-HERE>?
In most cases it means that one of the dependencies require packages not
declared in package.json. It is a common mistake caused by flat
node_modules. If this happens, this is an error in the dependency and the
dependency should be fixed. That might take time though, so pnpm supports
workarounds to make the buggy packages work.
Solution 1
In case there are issues, you can use the nodeLinker: hoisted setting.
This creates a flat node_modules structure similar to the one created by npm.
Solution 2
In the following example, a dependency does not have the iterall module in
its own list of deps.
The easiest solution to resolve missing dependencies of the buggy packages is to
add iterall as a dependency to our project's package.json.
You can do so, by installing it via pnpm add iterall, and will be
automatically added to your project's package.json.
"dependencies": {
...
"iterall": "^1.2.2",
...
}
Solution 3
One of the solutions is to use hooks for adding the missing
dependencies to the package's package.json.
An example was Webpack Dashboard which wasn't working with pnpm. It has
since been resolved such that it works with pnpm now.
It used to throw an error:
Error: Cannot find module 'babel-traverse'
at /node_modules/inspectpack@2.2.3/node_modules/inspectpack/lib/actions/parse
The problem was that babel-traverse was used in inspectpack which
was used by webpack-dashboard, but babel-traverse wasn't specified in
inspectpack's package.json. It still worked with npm and yarn because
they create flat node_modules.
The solution was to create a .pnpmfile.mjs with the following contents:
export const hooks = {
readPackage: (pkg) => {
if (pkg.name === "inspectpack") {
pkg.dependencies['babel-traverse'] = '^6.26.0';
}
return pkg;
}
}
After creating a .pnpmfile.mjs, run pnpm install. pnpm detects the changed
pnpmfile and resolves the dependencies again. There is no need to delete
pnpm-lock.yaml or node_modules.
packageExtensions adds
a missing dependency without a pnpmfile.