Zoltan KochanandClaude Opus 5.5
6f95957063
* docs: lint prose with Vale Add Vale with an in-repo style, .vale/styles/pnpm, that turns the writing rules in AGENTS.md and the Google developer documentation style guide into lint rules. The stock Vale packages (Google, Microsoft, RedHat, write-good) were too noisy to block on, for example 1,300 passive-voice hits in the v12 docs alone, so the rules are written for this repo, following the GitLab model. Each one links the guideline it enforces. Levels: - error, fails CI: dashes, plain-word substitutions, condescending words, "please", "note that", hedges, puffery, optional plurals, exclamation marks, ellipses, curly quotes, generic link text, product spellings, sentence-case headings, repeated words, double spaces, implementation history in comments; in changesets, bold or italic emphasis, internal names and release-line names. - warning: future tense, sentences over 30 words, "instead of" and "so that" tails in changesets. - suggestion: passive voice. .vale.ini scopes the rules. Docs get every rule. Contributor Markdown and code comments keep dashes and headings as warnings until their roughly 8,100 em dashes are rewritten. Released changesets stay in .changeset/ and are not rewritten, so lint-prose.mjs lints only the changesets added since PROSE_BASE (the PR base in CI). The prose workflow installs a pinned, checksum-verified Vale release and runs `pnpm lint:prose`. The rest of this change rewrites the existing docs, READMEs, contributor Markdown, and code comments to pass the error-level rules. Only prose and comment text changed. Renamed headings keep their anchors. Spelling stays with cspell, which checks identifiers that Vale does not see. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: keep prose lint from flattening meaning --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.1 KiB
Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct
Our Pledge
In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as contributors and maintainers pledge to make participation in our project and our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body size, disability, ethnicity, gender identity and expression, level of experience, nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
Our Standards
Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment include:
- Using welcoming and inclusive language
- Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
- Gracefully accepting constructive criticism
- Focusing on what is best for the community
- Showing empathy towards other community members
Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
- The use of sexualized language or imagery and unwelcome sexual attention or advances
- Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
- Public or private harassment
- Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or electronic address, without explicit permission
- Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a professional setting
Our Responsibilities
Project maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to any instances of unacceptable behavior.
Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive, or harmful.
Scope
This Code of Conduct applies both within project spaces and in public spaces when an individual is representing the project or its community. Examples of representing a project or community include using an official project e-mail address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed representative at an online or offline event. Representation of a project may be further defined and clarified by project maintainers.
Enforcement
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported by contacting the project team at coc@pnpm.io. The project team will review and investigate all complaints, and will respond in a way that it deems appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is obligated to maintain confidentiality about the reporter of an incident. Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.
Project maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good faith may face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other members of the project's leadership.
Attribution
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the Contributor Covenant, version 1.4, available at https://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4