mirror of
https://github.com/pnpm/pnpm.git
synced 2026-03-27 11:31:45 -04:00
aeb06caae9
* refactor: simplify patchedDependencies lockfile format to map selectors to hashes
Remove the `path` field from patchedDependencies in the lockfile, changing the
format from `Record<string, { path: string, hash: string }>` to
`Record<string, string>` (selector → hash). The path was never consumed from
the lockfile — patch file paths come from user config, not the lockfile.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: migrate old patchedDependencies format when reading lockfile
When reading a lockfile with the old `{ path, hash }` format for
patchedDependencies, extract just the hash string. This ensures
backwards compatibility with existing lockfiles.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: carry patchFilePath through patch groups for runtime patch application
The previous commit removed `path` from the lockfile format but also
accidentally dropped it from the runtime PatchInfo type. This broke
patch application since `applyPatchToDir` needs the file path.
- Add optional `patchFilePath` to `PatchInfo` for runtime use
- Build patch groups with resolved file paths in install
- Fix `build-modules` to use `patchFilePath` instead of `file.path`
- Fix `calcPatchHashes` call site in `checkDepsStatus` (extra arg)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: update remaining references to old PatchFile type
- Update getPatchInfo tests to use { hash, key } instead of { file, key }
- Fix createDeployFiles to handle patchedDependencies as hash strings
- Fix configurationalDependencies test assertion
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: throw when patch exists but patchFilePath is missing
Also guard against undefined patchedDependencies entry when
ignorePackageManifest is true.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: don't join lockfileDir with already-absolute patch file paths
opts.patchedDependencies values are already absolute paths, so
path.join(opts.lockfileDir, absolutePath) created invalid doubled
paths like /project/home/runner/work/pnpm/...
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: use path.resolve for patch file paths and address Copilot review
- Use path.resolve instead of path.join to correctly handle both
relative and absolute patch file paths
- Use PnpmError instead of plain Error for missing patch file path
- Only copy patchedDependencies to deploy output when manifest
provides the patch file paths
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: pass rootProjectManifest in deploy patchedDependencies test
The test was missing rootProjectManifest, so createDeployFiles could
not find the manifest's patchedDependencies to propagate to the
deploy output.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
49 lines
1.6 KiB
TypeScript
49 lines
1.6 KiB
TypeScript
import { getPatchInfo, groupPatchedDependencies } from '../src/index.js'
|
|
|
|
const _getPatchInfo = (patchedDependencies: Record<string, string>, name: string, version: string) =>
|
|
getPatchInfo(groupPatchedDependencies(patchedDependencies), name, version)
|
|
|
|
test('getPatchInfo(undefined, ...) returns undefined', () => {
|
|
expect(getPatchInfo(undefined, 'foo', '1.0.0')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
test('getPatchInfo(_, name, version) if name@version exists', () => {
|
|
expect(_getPatchInfo({
|
|
'foo@1.0.0': '00000000000000000000000000000000',
|
|
}, 'foo', '1.0.0')).toStrictEqual({
|
|
hash: expect.any(String),
|
|
key: 'foo@1.0.0',
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
test('getPatchInfo(_, name, version) if name exists but name@version does not exist', () => {
|
|
expect(_getPatchInfo({
|
|
foo: '00000000000000000000000000000000',
|
|
}, 'foo', '1.0.0')).toStrictEqual({
|
|
hash: expect.any(String),
|
|
key: 'foo',
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
test('getPatchInfo(_, name, version) prioritizes name@version over name if both exist', () => {
|
|
expect(_getPatchInfo({
|
|
foo: '00000000000000000000000000000000',
|
|
'foo@1.0.0': '00000000000000000000000000000000',
|
|
}, 'foo', '1.0.0')).toStrictEqual({
|
|
hash: expect.any(String),
|
|
key: 'foo@1.0.0',
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
test('getPatchInfo(_, name, version) does not access wrong name', () => {
|
|
expect(_getPatchInfo({
|
|
'bar@1.0.0': '00000000000000000000000000000000',
|
|
}, 'foo', '1.0.0')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
test('getPatchInfo(_, name, version) does not access wrong version', () => {
|
|
expect(_getPatchInfo({
|
|
'foo@2.0.0': '00000000000000000000000000000000',
|
|
}, 'foo', '1.0.0')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|