* Networking: serve streams on connections a protocol dials
The connection cache is shared between the dial side and the accept side,
so once a protocol dials a peer, the peer's own send path finds that
connection and opens its streams on it. Nothing read those streams: only
connections the event loop accepted, or those the reconnect loop handed
over, had a stream handler. The peer's request then sat unanswered until
its 30 s timeout while requests in the other direction answered in
milliseconds. This is the reverse RegisterDeviceRequest timeout SPAC-12
saw after join-remote.
get_or_create_connection now hands every connection it dials to the
event loop as TrackOutboundConnection, which spawns the same stream
handler an inbound connection gets. Messaging, sync, and job activity
pass their event loop handle; pairing keeps its own connection handling.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai-staging[bot] <305915985+capy-ai-staging[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Sync: the device that joins a library is the one that backfills
Every sync service started Uninitialized and backfilled from the first
connected partner, whatever state it already held. When the Mac Studio
joined the MacBook's library the MacBook was the one with a partner in
its device table, so it went Uninitialized -> Backfilling{Studio} and
applied the empty copy's snapshot over its own rows (LWW on the
deterministic default-space UUID). The Studio never backfilled because
the reverse registration had timed out and its device table held only
itself.
A copy of a library created from another device's library is the only
thing that may start Uninitialized. create_library_with_id now writes an
initial_backfill_pending marker into sync.db; PeerSync reads it on open
and starts Ready otherwise. A Ready device never requests a snapshot
(SharedChangeRequest.include_snapshot = false on catch-up) and repeated
catch-up failures no longer escalate to a full backfill. A copy still
waiting for its own first backfill refuses to serve as a join target.
The join carries the rule explicitly: RegisterDeviceRequest has
needs_initial_state, and RegisterDeviceResponse returns the responder's
own device record so the joiner's table is complete when the command
returns, replacing the spawned reverse request. sync_setup fails
instead of reporting devices_registered: true when that record is
missing.
Catch-up completion is recorded per peer in sync.db even when no rows
arrived; the Ready loop catches up once with a peer it has no record
for and no longer re-polls every peer whose watermark is 60 s old. A
missing watermark means never synced, not ancient, so the forced full
sync warning only fires for a real watermark past retention.
library_join_test pairs two daemons for real, joins Bob to Alice's
library, and asserts Alice's rows are unchanged, Bob holds Alice's
device row and spaces, and Alice runs no further catch-ups.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai-staging[bot] <305915985+capy-ai-staging[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Sync: test that catch-up with an empty peer runs once
Alice holds a volume, Bob holds nothing of his own, so Alice never
writes a per-resource watermark for Bob. Before the per-peer catch-up
record, that made Bob a new peer on every loop iteration and Alice
caught up with him forever (2 -> 5 sessions in 16 s on 5e285d3). The
test asserts the session count stops moving and the record exists.
Both new suites join the xtask integration list.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai-staging[bot] <305915985+capy-ai-staging[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Library info: fleet totals count the same devices as device_count
add_device_summaries added every cached peer summary to a library's
statistics, whatever library the peer belonged to, and the summaries
carried no source count. A joined device therefore reported the member's
3 million files next to Sources 0 and Devices 1.
Summaries now carry the device's own source_count, and only summaries
of devices in the library's device table are added, so files, content,
sources, and capacity describe the members that device_count counts.
The CLI labels the block "Statistics (all library members)".
Co-authored-by: capy-ai-staging[bot] <305915985+capy-ai-staging[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Docs: describe the pairing and library join flow as it runs
pairing.mdx and devices.mdx described a confirmation prompt that does
not exist and pointed at `sd devices list` for pairing status, which
reads the library's device table and does not show a peer until it
joins the library. The CLI overview lacked the global `--device` flag,
and the sync setup walkthrough never named `library sync-setup
--action join-remote` or `--node-id`. All four now describe the flow
SPAC-12 ran, and library-sync.mdx gains sections on joining, catch-up,
and fleet totals. One PROJECT_STATUS register row.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai-staging[bot] <305915985+capy-ai-staging[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Sync: catch up once per connection session, never serve a snapshot while pending
Review of #3110 found two gaps. The per-peer catch-up record was never
cleared, so a peer that changed rows while disconnected was never caught
up with again after reconnecting (the live broadcast only lives in the
in-memory retry queue). The record is now cleared when the sync service
starts and when the peer's connection is lost; ConnectionEstablished is
not used because the event loop emits it per accepted stream.
The SharedChangeRequest handler attached a full snapshot without
checking the first-backfill marker, so two copies that both joined from
the same member could seed each other. It now refuses the snapshot while
pending, and the register handler reads the marker from sync.db directly
when the library's sync service is not up yet.
Also: a failed backfill or catch-up left active_backfill_sessions
incremented; the mock transport no longer lists a peer as a partner
before its sync service is registered; the catch-up test now starts
Alice Ready (marker cleared) and Bob pending, the shape of a real join,
and asserts exactly one catch-up and one backfill.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai-staging[bot] <305915985+capy-ai-staging[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Sync: move past a peer that refuses a snapshot, fail the guard closed, refresh stale catch-ups
A joiner whose chosen peer refused the snapshot kept choosing it: every
partner was scored has_complete_state: true and RTT is only recorded on
success, so the order never changed. A peer whose backfill failed now
scores without complete state until a backfill succeeds, so a connected
member holding the library is tried next.
The snapshot guard read an unreadable marker as "holds state"; it now
refuses, since a wrong refusal only delays a join.
A broadcast whose retries ran out while the QUIC session stayed up had
no recovery under the once-per-session rule. The Ready loop refreshes a
catch-up record older than ten minutes; with per-peer watermarks an
empty refresh is two small requests.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai-staging[bot] <305915985+capy-ai-staging[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: capy-ai-staging[bot] <305915985+capy-ai-staging[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
xtask
Build automation tasks for Spacedrive using the xtask pattern.
What is xtask?
The xtask pattern is the idiomatic Rust way to handle project-specific build automation. Instead of using shell scripts, Makefiles, JavaScript, or external build tools, you write your build tasks as Rust code in a workspace member called xtask.
This approach is used by major Rust projects including:
- rust-analyzer - IDE support
- tokio - async runtime
- cargo itself - Rust's package manager
Benefits
- Pure Rust - No shell scripts or JavaScript tooling
- Type-safe - Catch errors at compile time
- Debuggable - Use standard Rust debugging tools
- Cross-platform - Works on Windows, macOS, Linux
- No external tools - Just
cargoandrustup - Self-contained - No need for pnpm, node, or JavaScript
Usage
Run tasks using cargo xtask:
# Setup development environment (replaces pnpm prep)
cargo xtask setup
# Build iOS framework (device + simulator)
cargo xtask build-ios
# Or use the convenient alias:
cargo ios
Available Commands
test-core
Single source of truth for core integration tests!
Runs all sd-core integration tests with progress tracking and result summary. This command is used by both CI and local development, ensuring consistency.
Usage:
cargo xtask test-core # Run with minimal output
cargo xtask test-core --verbose # Show full test output
Features:
- Progress tracking (shows which test is running)
- Timing for each test suite
- Summary report showing passed/failed tests
- Same test definitions used in CI workflows
- Continues running even if some tests fail
All tests are defined in xtask/src/test_core.rs as the single source of truth.
Add or remove tests there and they automatically apply to both CI and local runs.
setup
Replaces pnpm prep with a pure Rust implementation!
Sets up your development environment:
- Downloads native dependencies (FFmpeg, protoc, OpenSSL, libheif, etc.)
- Extracts them to
apps/.deps/ - Downloads iOS-specific deps if iOS targets are installed
- Creates symlinks for shared libraries (macOS/Linux)
- Generates
.cargo/config.tomlfrom the template
Usage:
cargo xtask setup
First time setup:
# Install Rust if you haven't already
curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://sh.rustup.rs | sh
# Add iOS targets (macOS only, optional)
rustup target add aarch64-apple-ios aarch64-apple-ios-sim x86_64-apple-ios
# Run setup
cargo xtask setup
# Build the CLI
cargo build
build-ios
Builds the sd-ios-core library for iOS (macOS only):
- Compiles for
aarch64-apple-ios(physical devices) - Compiles for
aarch64-apple-ios-sim(M1/M2 simulator) - Compiles for
x86_64-apple-ios(Intel simulator) - Creates universal simulator library (ARM64 + x86_64) using
lipo - Updates the existing XCFramework that Xcode is already using
Output: apps/ios/sd-ios-core/sd_ios_core.xcframework/
The XCFramework structure looks like:
sd_ios_core.xcframework/
├── Info.plist # Top-level XCFramework metadata
├── ios-arm64/
│ ├── libsd_ios_core.a # Device library
│ └── Info.plist # Device metadata
└── ios-arm64-simulator/
├── libsd_ios_core.a # Universal simulator library (ARM64 + x86_64)
└── Info.plist # Simulator metadata
How It Works
The xtask pattern works through Cargo's workspace and alias features. When you run:
cargo ios
Cargo:
- Looks for an alias in
.cargo/config.toml - Expands it to
cargo run --package xtask -- build-ios - Builds and runs the
xtaskbinary - Passes
build-iosas an argument
The xtask binary is just a regular Rust program that uses std::process::Command to invoke cargo builds and file operations.
Migration from Old Setup
Replaced: pnpm prep (JavaScript)
Old way:
pnpm i # Install JS dependencies
pnpm prep # Run JavaScript setup script
New way:
cargo xtask setup # Pure Rust, no JS needed!
Replaced: scripts/build_ios_xcframework.sh (Bash)
Old way:
./scripts/build_ios_xcframework.sh
New way:
cargo ios # Convenient alias
# or
cargo xtask build-ios
Why the Change?
- Old: Required pnpm, node, JavaScript dependencies, bash scripts
- New: Only requires Rust toolchain (cargo/rustup)
- Result: Faster setup, fewer dependencies, more maintainable
Requirements
- Rust toolchain with iOS targets installed:
rustup target add aarch64-apple-ios aarch64-apple-ios-sim x86_64-apple-ios - Xcode with iOS SDK (for
lipocommand)
Adding New Tasks
To add a new task:
- Add a new function in
src/main.rs - Add a match arm in
main()to call your function - Document it in the help message
- Optionally add a cargo alias in
.cargo/config.toml
Example:
fn clean_ios() -> Result<()> {
// Clean iOS builds
todo!()
}
// In main():
match args[1].as_str() {
"build-ios" => build_ios()?,
"clean-ios" => clean_ios()?, // Add this
_ => { /* ... */ }
}
Further Reading
- matklad's blog post on xtask (creator of rust-analyzer)
- cargo-xtask documentation