This updates our logging framework from legacy freetext strings using
the `log` package to structured log entries using `log/slog`. I have
updated all INFO or higher level entries, but not yet DEBUG (😓)... So,
at a high level:
There is a slight change in log levels, effectively adding a new warning
level:
- DEBUG is still debug (ideally not for users but developers, though
this is something we need to work on)
- INFO is still info, though I've added more data here, effectively
making Syncthing more verbose by default (more on this below)
- WARNING is a new log level that is different from the _old_ WARNING
(more below)
- ERROR is what was WARNING before -- problems that must be dealt with,
and also bubbled as a popup in the GUI.
A new feature is that the logging level can be set per package to
something other than just debug or info, and hence I feel that we can
add a bit more things into INFO while moving some (in fact, most)
current INFO level warnings into WARNING. For example, I think it's
justified to get a log of synced files in INFO and sync failures in
WARNING. These are things that have historically been tricky to debug
properly, and having more information by default will be useful to many,
while still making it possible get close to told level of inscrutability
by setting the log level to WARNING. I'd like to get to a stage where
DEBUG is never necessary to just figure out what's going on, as opposed
to trying to narrow down a likely bug.
Code wise:
- Our logging object, generally known as `l` in each package, is now a
new adapter object that provides the old API on top of the newer one.
(This should go away once all old log entries are migrated.) This is
only for `l.Debugln` and `l.Debugf`.
- There is a new level tracker that keeps the log level for each
package.
- There is a nested setup of handlers, since the structure mandated by
`log/slog` is slightly convoluted (imho). We do this because we need to
do formatting at a "medium" level internally so we can buffer log lines
in text format but with separate timestamp and log level for the API/GUI
to consume.
- The `debug` API call becomes a `loglevels` API call, which can set the
log level to `DEBUG`, `INFO`, `WARNING` or `ERROR` per package. The GUI
is updated to handle this.
- Our custom `sync` package provided some debugging of mutexes quite
strongly integrated into the old logging framework, only turned on when
`STTRACE` was set to certain values at startup, etc. It's been a long
time since this has been useful; I removed it.
- The `STTRACE` env var remains and can be used the same way as before,
while additionally permitting specific log levels to be specified,
`STTRACE=model:WARN,scanner:DEBUG`.
- There is a new command line option `--log-level=INFO` to set the
default log level.
- The command line options `--log-flags` and `--verbose` go away, but
are currently retained as hidden & ignored options since we set them by
default in some of our startup examples and Syncthing would otherwise
fail to start.
Sample format messages:
```
2009-02-13 23:31:30 INF A basic info line (attr1="val with spaces" attr2=2 attr3="val\"quote" a=a log.pkg=slogutil)
2009-02-13 23:31:30 INF An info line with grouped values (attr1=val1 foo.attr2=2 foo.bar.attr3=3 a=a log.pkg=slogutil)
2009-02-13 23:31:30 INF An info line with grouped values via logger (foo.attr1=val1 foo.attr2=2 a=a log.pkg=slogutil)
2009-02-13 23:31:30 INF An info line with nested grouped values via logger (bar.foo.attr1=val1 bar.foo.attr2=2 a=a log.pkg=slogutil)
2009-02-13 23:31:30 WRN A warning entry (a=a log.pkg=slogutil)
2009-02-13 23:31:30 ERR An error (a=a log.pkg=slogutil)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Ross Smith II <ross@smithii.com>
We've always, since the introduction of conflicts, had the policy that
deletes lose against any other change, for safety's sake. This is a
problem, however, because it means the sort order of versions is not a
total order.
That is, given two versions `A` and `B` that are currently in conflict,
we will sort them in a given order (let's say `A, B`, so `A < B` for
ordering purposes: we say "A wins over B" or "A is newer than B") and
consider the first in the list the winner. The loser (who has `B` on
disk) will process the conflict at some point and move the file to a
conflict copy and announce `A'` as the resolved conflict. The winner
(with `A` on disk) doesn't do anything.
However, if `A` is deleted the ordering changes. We still have `A < B`
and, of course, `Adel < A` (this is not even a conflict, just linear
order). In most sane systems this would imply the ordering `Adel < A <
B`, however in our case we in fact have `B < Adel` because any version
wins over a deleted one, so there is no logical ordering at all of the
files at this point. `Adel < A < B < Adel ???` In practice the deleted
version may end up at the head or the tail of the list, depending on the
order we do the compares.
Hence, at this point, "whatever" happens and it's not guaranteed to make
any sense. 😬
I propose that we resolve this my simply letting deletes be versions
like anything else and maintain a total ordering based on just version
vectors with the existing tie breakers like always. That means a delete
can win in a conflict situation, and the result should be that the file
is moved to a conflict copy on the losing device. I think this retains
the data safety to almost the same degree as previously, while removing
probably an entire class of strange out of sync bugs...
---
(A potential wrinkle here is that, ideally, we wouldn't even create the
conflict copy when the delete and the losing version represent the same
data -- same as when we handle normal modification conflicts. However,
the deleted FileInfo doesn't carry any information on what the contents
were, so we can't do that right now. A possible future extension would
be to carry the block list hash of the deleted data in the deleted
FileInfo and use that for this purpose, but I don't want to complicate
this PR with that. The block list hash itself also isn't a
protocol-defined thing at the moment, it's something implementation
dependent that we just use locally.)
This is a draft because I haven't adjusted all the tests yet, I'd like
to get feedback on the change overall first, before spending time on
that.
In my opinion the main win of this change is in it's lower complexity
resp. fewer moving parts. It should also be faster as it only does one
query instead of two, but I have no idea if that's practically
relevant.
This also mirrors the v1 DB, where a block map key had the name
appended. Not that this is an argument for the change, it was mostly
reassuring me that I might not be missing something key here
conceptually (I might still be of course, please tell me :) ).
And the change isn't mainly intrinsically motivated, instead it came
up while fixing a bug in the copier. And the nested nature of that code
makes the fix harder, and "un-nesting" it required me to understand
what's happening. This change fell out of that.
This changes the database structure to use one database per folder, with
a small main database to coordinate. Reverts the prior change to buffer
all files in memory when pulling, meaning there is now a phase where the
WAL file will grow significantly, at least for initial sync of folders
with many directories.
---------
Co-authored-by: bt90 <btom1990@googlemail.com>
This reduces the number of file entries we carry in the database,
sometimes significantly. The downside is that if a file is deleted while
a device is offline, and that device comes back more than the cutoff
interval (six months) later, those files will get resurrected at some
point.
The current limit is far too low for our workloads. Perhaps we should
aim even higher than the 64MiB this patch proposes?
Citing the sqlite docs:
> [...] after committing a transaction the rollback journal file may
remain in the file-system. **This increases performance for subsequent
transactions since overwriting an existing file is faster than append to
a file**, but it also consumes file-system space.
tl;dr: if the limit is too low, we're shooting ourselves in the foot in
terms of performance.
Switch the database from LevelDB to SQLite, for greater stability and
simpler code.
Co-authored-by: Tommy van der Vorst <tommy@pixelspark.nl>
Co-authored-by: bt90 <btom1990@googlemail.com>
