This reduces database migration memory usage in my test scenario from
3.8 GB to 440 MB. In principle I don't think we're causing many temp
tables to be generated anyway in normal usage, but if we do and someone
can benchmark a performance difference, we can add a tunable. I ran the
database benchmark before and after and didn't see a difference above
the noise level.
Signed-off-by: Jakob Borg <jakob@kastelo.net>
This changes the database structure to use one database per folder, with
a small main database to coordinate. Reverts the prior change to buffer
all files in memory when pulling, meaning there is now a phase where the
WAL file will grow significantly, at least for initial sync of folders
with many directories.
---------
Co-authored-by: bt90 <btom1990@googlemail.com>
