mirror of
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty.git
synced 2026-08-03 03:08:53 -04:00
Follow-up to #23215 (merged). Rebased on `main`. ## Why #23215 fixes an instance of a class of bug: an upgrade command whose version is chosen at `generate:instance-command` time from `TWENTY_CURRENT_VERSION`, then left behind when `main` bumps the version before the PR merges (base-drift). The command ships one minor early and instances already on the newer version skip it forever. The existing `server-previous-version-upgrade-mutation-guard` in `ci-server.yaml` runs on `pull_request`, so it validates against the PR's base. When the base is stale (main moved after the branch was cut), the guard reads the branch's own `TWENTY_CURRENT_VERSION` and the check passes even though the command is now a version behind main. That is exactly how the original bug slipped through. ## What The version-directory and append-only-timestamp validation is extracted into a shared composite action, `.github/actions/upgrade-mutation-guard`, diffed against a caller-supplied `base_sha`. It is called from two places: - **`ci-server.yaml`** (PR-level guard, `base = pull_request.base.sha`) for fast feedback. The job keeps its existing name/check. This replaces ~290 lines of inline shell. - **`ci-merge-queue.yaml`** (new, `merge_group`-triggered, `base = merge_group.base_sha`). GitHub builds each merge-queue candidate on top of the current tip of `main`, so the checks read `TWENTY_CURRENT_VERSION` and the existing per-directory timestamps from main's real state at merge time. Because the candidate is rebased onto main, base-drift is caught by construction: the same validation simply runs where the base is guaranteed current. No origin/main comparison hack; the logic now lives in one place. ## Bypass semantics The guard has two independent checks, and they are treated differently on purpose: - **Version-directory check** keeps its `ci:allow-previous-version-upgrade-mutation` bypass, a deliberate, reviewed escape hatch for legitimately touching a previous-version directory. The PR-level guard reads the label directly; the merge-queue guard resolves it from the queued PR (the `merge_group` event carries no labels) and passes it to the composite action, which skips only the version-directory step. - **Timestamp / append-only check has no bypass.** The old `ci:allow-upgrade-command-timestamp-exception` label is removed. A fake or out-of-order timestamp rewinds the upgrade cursor and re-hides already-applied columns, so there is no "allowed" version of it: the timestamp just has to be configured correctly (real epoch millis, strictly greater than every existing command in the same version directory). If a blocking existing max is itself a fabricated future timestamp, re-slot that command to its real merge epoch rather than reaching for a bypass. Preventing previous-version mutation is the guard's primary purpose. In the merge queue the guard job always runs and skips only the version-directory step when the bypass label is set, so it reports a real success/failure (the required check never resolves to a skipped state, and a label-lookup failure fails closed) and the timestamp check always runs. ## Requires a settings change (not in this diff) Enabling the merge queue and marking the check required are branch-protection settings, not file changes. After merge, an admin needs to: 1. Enable the merge queue for `main` in branch protection. 2. Add `CI - Merge Queue / upgrade-mutation-guard` to the merge queue's required checks. ## Notes - Composite action, not a `workflow_call` reusable workflow, deliberately: converting the `ci-server.yaml` job to a reusable-workflow call would rename its status check to `server-previous-version-upgrade-mutation-guard / ` and break that required-check mapping in branch protection. A composite action dedups the logic while keeping both callers' check names intact. --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Rastoin <paul.rastoin@gmail.com>