A trigger run with nobody present only reads unless its trigger holds
act.* grants, and until now only the REST API could set them. An agent
that proposes a trigger can now ask for acts too:
- propose_trigger takes an optional acts list. The names must be
act.* grants the agent of the chat holds; anything else is refused
and nothing is stored. A read_only proposal cannot carry acts.
- The proposal stores the list. Confirming it, in Studio, by a plain
yes or by confirm CODE, grants exactly that list. No tool changes
the acts of a trigger afterwards. Two proposals that differ only in
their acts are kept apart.
- The text of a proposal in a messaging app now has a Permissions
line, in plain words with sensitive classes marked: read only, or
what a run may do. The confirmation repeats it. A proposal that asks
for acts is never set up without a yes, whatever the approval mode.
- The trigger REST object gains acts_held, read_only and
read_only_why, computed with the same rules as the run, so a client
can show why a run only reads.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-sonnet-5-5 go ginkgo
Ettore Di Giacinto
d8bd3879f2