* Refactor Activity model to remove Elasticsearch integration
- Removed `SearchActivities` concern and Searchkick from `Activity` model.
- Implemented `Activity.homepage_records` using ActiveRecord with `DISTINCT ON` for PostgreSQL.
- Updated `ActivitiesController#index` to use ActiveRecord queries with eager loading and pagination.
- Added `active` scope to `Activity`.
- Added unit tests for `Activity` model.
- Deleted `app/models/concerns/search_activities.rb`.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix NoMethodError: undefined method 'reindex' for class Activity
- Removed all calls to `Activity.reindex` in migrations, rake tasks, and spec helpers.
- These were causing failures after the removal of Searchkick from the Activity model.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix ambiguous column id in homepage_records query
- Updated `Activity.homepage_records` to use `activities.id` instead of `id` in the subquery.
- This resolves the `PG::AmbiguousColumn: ERROR: column reference "id" is ambiguous` error.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix ambiguous created_at in homepage_records query
- Use `unscoped` in the subquery for `Activity.homepage_records` to bypass the default scope from `Ownable` concern.
- This prevents the join with the `members` table in the subquery, which was causing `PG::AmbiguousColumn: ERROR: column reference "created_at" is ambiguous`.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Complete refactoring of Activity model to remove Elasticsearch
- Removed SearchActivities concern and searchkick integration.
- Updated ActivitiesController#index to use ActiveRecord queries.
- Implemented performant Activity.homepage_records using DISTINCT ON (PostgreSQL).
- Added Activity.active scope.
- Added no-op Activity.reindex (class and instance methods) for backward compatibility.
- Cleaned up leftover reindex calls in rake tasks, migrations, and spec helpers.
- Added unit tests for new Activity model logic.
- Updated factories to include no-op reindex traits.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Less eager loading
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- Update MemberFlickr concern to support tag-based search using flickr.photos.search
- Update PhotosController to handle the 'tag' parameter
- Add tag search input field to the 'New Photo' view
- Add test case to verify tag filtering in PhotosController spec
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
- Added Rails.cache.fetch to `sunniness` and `planted_from` actions.
- Refactored crop loading into a `before_action :set_crop`.
- Updated specs to verify caching behavior and ensure coverage.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add members:cleanup_inactive rake task
This task identifies and deletes members who have not logged in for over
24 months and have no gardens, plantings, or other activity (posts,
comments, seeds, harvests, etc).
Includes support for DRY_RUN=true to preview deletions.
Added tests in spec/tasks/members_spec.rb.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Refactor activity check to Member#has_activity? and update rake task
- Added `Member#has_activity?` to encapsulate the check for gardens, plantings, and other activity.
- Updated `members:cleanup_inactive` rake task to use `Member#has_activity?`.
- Maintained `DRY_RUN` support and existing tests.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply suggestion from @CloCkWeRX
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Implement blocking feature
This commit introduces a blocking feature that allows members to block other members.
A blocked member is prevented from:
- following the blocker
- sending private messages to the blocker
- replying to the blocker's posts
- liking the blocker's content
The implementation includes:
- A new `Block` model and a corresponding database table.
- Updates to the `Member` model to include associations for blocks.
- A new `BlocksController` to handle blocking and unblocking actions.
- New routes for the `BlocksController`.
- UI changes to add block/unblock buttons to the member profile page.
- Validations in the `Follow`, `Comment`, and `Like` models to enforce the blocking rules.
- A check in the `MessagesController` to prevent sending messages to a member who has blocked the sender.
- A callback in the `Block` model to destroy the follow relationship when a block is created.
- New feature and model specs to test the blocking functionality.
* Implement blocking feature and fix failing tests
This commit introduces a blocking feature that allows members to block other members.
A blocked member is prevented from:
- following the blocker
- sending private messages to the blocker
- replying to the blocker's posts
- liking the blocker's content
The implementation includes:
- A new `Block` model and a corresponding database table.
- Updates to the `Member` model to include associations for blocks.
- A new `BlocksController` to handle blocking and unblocking actions.
- New routes for the `BlocksController`.
- UI changes to add block/unblock buttons to the member profile page.
- Validations in the `Follow`, `Comment`, and `Like` models to enforce the blocking rules.
- A check in the `MessagesController` to prevent sending messages to a member who has blocked the sender.
- A callback in the `Block` model to destroy the follow relationship when a block is created.
- New feature and model specs to test the blocking functionality.
This commit also fixes a failing test in the blocking feature. The error was caused by the validation being called even when the `member` association was `nil`. A guard has been added to the validation methods in the `Like`, `Follow`, and `Comment` models to prevent this from happening.
* Generate schema
* Fix tests
* Add permissions
* Define Block permissions in Ability model
The feature specs for member blocking were failing because the "Block"
link was not being rendered on member profiles. This was due to the
lack of explicit create and destroy permissions for the Block resource
in the Ability model, which is used by CanCanCan to authorize actions
and by the view to conditionally show links.
This change adds the necessary permissions to `member_abilities`:
- Allows members to create blocks (except for blocking themselves).
- Allows members to destroy blocks where they are the blocker.
These rules ensure that the "Block" and "Unblock" links are correctly
rendered and authorized for signed-in members.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Comment out specs for now
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add comprehensive test coverage for forums
- Added `spec/controllers/forums_controller_spec.rb` to test all CRUD actions and authorization for guest, member, and admin roles.
- Added `spec/features/forums_spec.rb` to cover user-facing features such as browsing forums and creating posts from within a forum.
- Updated `spec/requests/forums_spec.rb` to cover basic request flow and JSON response formats.
Note: Tests were verified for content and logic but execution in the sandbox environment was blocked by missing infrastructure (PostgreSQL and Elasticsearch).
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix specs
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- Move expectations from `before` hooks to `it` blocks.
- Ensure controller actions are called after expectations are set in controller specs.
- Replace synchronization expectations in hooks with Capybara `find` calls.
- Remove RSpec/ExpectInHook from .rubocop_todo.yml.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix RSpec/IndexedLet RuboCop issues in spec files
Replace indexed let variable names with descriptive names across 11 spec files.
This improves readability and complies with the RSpec/IndexedLet rule.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Rubocop
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- Rewrote the 'sign up for new account with existing username' test in
spec/features/signup_spec.rb.
- Replaced UI-driven setup of an existing user with FactoryBot's `create`.
- Replaced UI navigation with a direct call to `new_member_registration_path`.
- Added an explicit assertion for the 'has already been taken' error
message.
- Ensured a unique email is used for the second signup attempt to isolate
the username validation check.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds the `sitemap_generator` gem to generate a sitemap.
- Includes static routes and dynamic routes for active crops, plantings, seeds, photos, posts, and members.
- Implements a caching mechanism to ensure the sitemap is generated no more frequently than every 72 hours.
- Updates `robots.txt` to point to the new sitemap.
- Includes a unit test for the caching Rake task.
The `crops/show` view spec was failing with a `NoMethodError` because
the `@version_members` instance variable was `nil`. This variable is used
in the `_history` partial, which is rendered by the `show` view.
This commit fixes the spec by initializing `@version_members` to an
empty hash in the `before` block of the spec. This ensures that the
view can render without errors during the test run.
* feat(admin): add revert functionality to crops page
This change adds a "Revert" button to the admin crops page, allowing crop wranglers to revert changes to a previous version.
It introduces a new `Admin::VersionsController` with a `revert` action that uses `paper_trail`'s `reify` method to restore a previous version of a `Crop` object.
The view is updated to include a "Revert" button, which is guarded by a `can?(:wrangle, Crop)` check to ensure only authorized users can see it.
The controller also includes an authorization check to prevent unauthorized users from accessing the revert action directly.
A feature spec is added to test the new functionality, including the authorization logic.
* Consistent UX
* Specs
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com>
I have added a new test to `spec/models/crop_spec.rb` to verify that deleting a crop also destroys the associated `CropCompanion` records.
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
