Nate Graham 0ff55a9698 Use BFQ I/O scheduler for spinning disks
It offers much better latency in exchange for only a modest reduction
in throughput, and only for some workflows. High latency being a
defining negative characteristic of spinning disks, this seems like a
worthwhile trade-off for us to make for desktop usage.

This doesn't change the default I/O schedulers for flash-based storage,
as the defaults seem sensibly chosen (`none` for NVMe SSDs and
`mq-deadline` for everything else).

Related to #258
2025-08-29 07:50:16 -06:00
2025-05-02 20:52:36 +02:00
2025-06-12 07:49:31 +00:00
2025-06-12 07:49:31 +00:00
2025-08-28 14:06:27 -06:00
2025-06-12 07:49:31 +00:00
2023-05-15 14:25:50 +02:00
2025-08-28 18:42:01 +02:00
2025-04-30 18:55:45 +02:00
2025-07-17 08:28:38 -06:00
2025-08-06 15:26:44 +02:00
2025-08-25 18:18:10 +02:00
2024-11-28 17:22:38 +01:00
2025-08-06 14:02:18 +02:00
2024-12-04 23:47:36 +00:00
2025-08-27 20:47:55 +03:00
2025-04-30 07:16:14 -06:00
2025-08-06 12:55:18 +02:00
2025-08-21 01:15:10 +02:00

This is the repository for the KDE Linux project. Please consult the wiki for further information

https://community.kde.org/KDE_Linux

For installation details see the Installation section

https://community.kde.org/KDE_Linux#Installation

Description
No description provided
Readme 4.9 MiB
Languages
Shell 51.6%
Go 25.2%
Python 7.7%
Rust 7.5%
QML 5.6%
Other 2.4%