Zoltan Kochan 51839cd3b8 perf(package-manager): parallelize cold-batch slot linking (#12249)
The cold batch in `CreateVirtualStore` ran each per-snapshot
`InstallPackageBySnapshot` as a future inside one cooperative
`try_join_all` task, and each future called the *blocking*
`CreateVirtualDirBySnapshot::run` (a `rayon::join` over CAS import +
symlink layout) directly. Because all the futures share a single task,
a blocking call in one prevents the others from being polled — so the
1308 slot-link operations on a fresh install serialized one-at-a-time,
each paying its own `rayon::join` dispatch. The warm batch already
avoids this by linking every slot in a single `rayon` `par_iter`.

This was invisible on warm/restore installs (everything goes through
the warm batch) but dominated the cold path: a pnpr client install,
whose fast offloaded resolution routes every package through the cold
batch, spent ~14.5s in `CreateVirtualStore` where an equivalent local
fresh install — which pre-fills the store during its slower resolution
and so hits the warm batch — spent ~5-7s linking.

Defer the slot link out of the per-snapshot download future (new
`InstallPackageBySnapshot::defer_link`) and run all the cold links in
one parallel `rayon` pass after the downloads, mirroring the warm
batch. On a fresh ~1300-package install through a pnpr server this cut
`CreateVirtualStore` from ~14.5s to ~9.5s and the end-to-end install
from ~18.5s to ~13s — now faster than the equivalent non-pnpr install
(~15.5s), which it should be since the pnpr client offloads resolution
and downloads less metadata. The progress events are unchanged in kind
and order (`fetched`/`found_in_store` still fire during download,
`imported` still fires once the slot is linked).

---
Written by an agent (Claude Code, claude-opus-4-8).
2026-06-06 23:40:07 +02:00
2026-04-10 18:30:33 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-04-30 23:03:46 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-05-24 02:23:07 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-04-30 23:19:31 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-04-30 23:03:46 +02:00
2026-06-05 08:27:41 +02:00
2026-01-16 16:31:31 +01:00
2024-03-21 01:09:22 +01:00

简体中文 | 日本語 | 한국어 | Italiano | Português Brasileiro

pnpm

Fast, disk space efficient package manager:

  • Fast. Up to 2x faster than the alternatives (see benchmark).
  • Efficient. Files inside node_modules are linked from a single content-addressable storage.
  • Great for monorepos.
  • Strict. A package can access only dependencies that are specified in its package.json.
  • Deterministic. Has a lockfile called pnpm-lock.yaml.
  • Works as a Node.js version manager. See pnpm runtime.
  • Works everywhere. Supports Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Battle-tested. Used in production by teams of all sizes since 2016.
  • See the full feature comparison with npm and Yarn.

To quote the Rush team:

Microsoft uses pnpm in Rush repos with hundreds of projects and hundreds of PRs per day, and weve found it to be very fast and reliable.

npm version OpenCollective OpenCollective X Follow Stand With Ukraine

Platinum Sponsors

Bit

Gold Sponsors

Sanity Discord Vite
SerpApi CodeRabbit Stackblitz
Workleap Nx

Silver Sponsors

Replit Cybozu devowl.io
u|screen Leniolabs_ Depot
Cerbos ⏱️ Time.now

Support this project by becoming a sponsor.

Background

pnpm uses a content-addressable filesystem to store all files from all module directories on a disk. When using npm, if you have 100 projects using lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be stored in a content-addressable storage, so:

  1. If you depend on different versions of lodash, only the files that differ are added to the store. If lodash has 100 files, and a new version has a change only in one of those files, pnpm update will only add 1 new file to the storage.
  2. All the files are saved in a single place on the disk. When packages are installed, their files are linked from that single place consuming no additional disk space. Linking is performed using either hard-links or reflinks (copy-on-write).

As a result, you save gigabytes of space on your disk and you have a lot faster installations! If you'd like more details about the unique node_modules structure that pnpm creates and why it works fine with the Node.js ecosystem, read this small article: Flat node_modules is not the only way.

💖 Like this project? Let people know with a tweet

Getting Started

Benchmark

pnpm is up to 2x faster than npm and Yarn classic. See all benchmarks here.

Benchmarks on an app with lots of dependencies:

License

MIT, except the pnpr/ directory, which is source-available under the PolyForm Shield License 1.0.0.

Description
No description provided
Readme MIT 280 MiB
Languages
Rust 59.8%
TypeScript 39.6%
JavaScript 0.5%