Zoltan Kochan 65c9bef283 ci(pnpr): inject network latency into the install-accelerator benchmark (#12166)
## What

The pnpr install accelerator is a **remote** server, but the integrated benchmark ran it on **loopback** (RTT ≈ 0), which hides the round-trip cost that dominates a real install — and that pnpr exists to reduce. This injects network latency so the benchmark measures pnpr as the remote service it is in production.

## How

A dependency-free, synchronous latency-injecting TCP proxy (`latency_proxy`) plus two knobs on `integrated-benchmark`:

- **`--pnpr-latency-ms`** — fronts each `pnpr@<rev>` server, so the client↔server link pays the given round trip (half each direction).
- **`--registry-latency-ms`** — fronts the registry for the direct (`pacquet`/`pnpm`/`--with-pnpm`) targets, so a direct install crosses the same network.

`pnpr@<rev>` targets keep a **direct (fast) registry link** — that models a warm, colocated server, so pnpr's advantage shows up as **fewer round trips, not a faster backend**:

```
direct target:  client → [latency proxy] → registry
pnpr target:     client → [latency proxy] → pnpr server → (direct) → registry
```

The workflow sets both equal (`50ms`) so the in-run pnpr-vs-direct ratio is fair and the `pnpr` Bencher testbed (pnpr@HEAD vs pnpr@main) becomes **sensitive to protocol round-trip-count changes** — which is what makes the upcoming protocol work (collapsing the 3-round-trip handshake/install/files flow) measurable on main. See #12165 for that plan.

## Notes

- **Latency only, no bandwidth cap.** The public registry is CDN-backed and CI runners are fast, so install time is latency/round-trip bound, not throughput bound — a bandwidth cap would be overly pessimistic. A high-ceiling, opt-in bandwidth knob can follow if a slow-link scenario is ever wanted.
- Both flags **default to `0`** (current behavior unchanged); the registry proxy is also skipped in `--registry=npm` mode (already remote).
- The proxy is unit-tested (a round trip through it reflects the injected latency). `cargo check`/`clippy`/`fmt`/`dylint` clean.
- One caveat the proxy does **not** model: TLS-handshake round trips and HTTP/2 multiplexing of a real CDN — it reproduces propagation delay, the dominant and relevant factor here, not a byte-exact replica of registry.npmjs.org.
2026-06-03 15:54:36 +02:00
2026-04-10 18:30:33 +02:00
2026-05-27 15:15:01 +02:00
2026-06-02 08:07:46 +02:00
2026-05-29 17:26:13 +02:00
2026-05-29 17:26:13 +02:00
2026-04-30 23:03:46 +02:00
2026-06-02 08:07:46 +02:00
2026-06-02 08:07:46 +02:00
2026-06-02 08:07:46 +02:00
2026-05-27 15:15:01 +02:00
2026-05-27 15:15:01 +02:00
2026-06-02 08:07:46 +02:00
2026-05-27 15:15:01 +02:00
2026-05-24 02:23:07 +02:00
2026-06-02 08:07:46 +02:00
2026-06-02 08:07:46 +02:00
2026-04-30 23:19:31 +02:00
2026-05-29 17:26:13 +02:00
2026-05-29 17:26:13 +02:00
2026-04-30 23:03:46 +02:00
2026-06-02 08:07:46 +02:00
2026-01-16 16:31:31 +01:00
2024-03-21 01:09:22 +01:00

简体中文 | 日本語 | 한국어 | Italiano | Português Brasileiro

pnpm

Fast, disk space efficient package manager:

  • Fast. Up to 2x faster than the alternatives (see benchmark).
  • Efficient. Files inside node_modules are linked from a single content-addressable storage.
  • Great for monorepos.
  • Strict. A package can access only dependencies that are specified in its package.json.
  • Deterministic. Has a lockfile called pnpm-lock.yaml.
  • Works as a Node.js version manager. See pnpm runtime.
  • Works everywhere. Supports Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Battle-tested. Used in production by teams of all sizes since 2016.
  • See the full feature comparison with npm and Yarn.

To quote the Rush team:

Microsoft uses pnpm in Rush repos with hundreds of projects and hundreds of PRs per day, and weve found it to be very fast and reliable.

npm version OpenCollective OpenCollective X Follow Stand With Ukraine

Platinum Sponsors

Bit

Gold Sponsors

Sanity Discord Vite
SerpApi CodeRabbit Stackblitz
Workleap Nx

Silver Sponsors

Replit Cybozu devowl.io
u|screen Leniolabs_ Depot
Cerbos ⏱️ Time.now

Support this project by becoming a sponsor.

Background

pnpm uses a content-addressable filesystem to store all files from all module directories on a disk. When using npm, if you have 100 projects using lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be stored in a content-addressable storage, so:

  1. If you depend on different versions of lodash, only the files that differ are added to the store. If lodash has 100 files, and a new version has a change only in one of those files, pnpm update will only add 1 new file to the storage.
  2. All the files are saved in a single place on the disk. When packages are installed, their files are linked from that single place consuming no additional disk space. Linking is performed using either hard-links or reflinks (copy-on-write).

As a result, you save gigabytes of space on your disk and you have a lot faster installations! If you'd like more details about the unique node_modules structure that pnpm creates and why it works fine with the Node.js ecosystem, read this small article: Flat node_modules is not the only way.

💖 Like this project? Let people know with a tweet

Getting Started

Benchmark

pnpm is up to 2x faster than npm and Yarn classic. See all benchmarks here.

Benchmarks on an app with lots of dependencies:

License

MIT, except the pnpr/ directory, which is source-available under the PolyForm Shield License 1.0.0.

Description
No description provided
Readme MIT 346 MiB
Languages
Rust 55.9%
TypeScript 43.5%
JavaScript 0.5%