Zoltan Kochan a7c94a905d perf(pacquet/resolving-deps-resolver): swap tokio Mutex for std Mutex on TreeCtx
`TreeCtx`'s state (`packages`, `dependencies_tree`,
`all_peer_dep_names`, `policy_violations`, `applied_patches`) was
guarded by `tokio::sync::Mutex`. Every visit acquired 2-3 of them
behind `.lock().await`, paying the async-mutex per-acquire
overhead (registration, future polling, wake) on the resolve hot
path.

None of the critical sections hold the lock across an `.await` —
they're short `HashMap` / `HashSet` inserts and `Vec::push`es.
That's exactly the shape `std::sync::Mutex` is for. Switch the
fields, remove the `.await`s, and route every acquire through a
new `lock_recoverable` helper that mirrors the rest of the
codebase's poisoning recovery (`build_modules.rs`,
`pick_package.rs`, …): an unrelated panic shouldn't escalate into
a hard install failure since the guarded values are plain
collections with no invariants that survive a panic.

Side effects:

- `TreeCtx::snapshot` and `TreeCtx::resolved_versions` drop the
  `async` qualifier and their callers drop the `.await`. The
  closures they live in are still `async` (they await elsewhere),
  so the change is mechanical.
- `update_preferred_versions_with_ctx` becomes sync along with
  `resolved_versions`.

Tests: 50/50 in `pacquet-resolving-deps-resolver` pass. Clippy
clean.
2026-05-22 00:36:35 +02:00
2026-04-10 18:30:33 +02:00
2026-04-10 18:30:33 +02:00
2026-05-20 12:41:09 +02:00
2026-05-20 16:51:13 +02:00
2026-05-20 12:41:09 +02:00
2026-05-21 15:45:17 +02:00
2026-05-20 16:51:13 +02:00
2026-05-20 12:41:09 +02:00
2026-05-20 16:51:13 +02:00
2026-05-20 12:41:09 +02:00
2026-04-30 23:03:46 +02:00
2026-05-21 15:45:17 +02:00
2026-05-20 16:51:13 +02:00
2026-05-21 15:45:17 +02:00
2026-05-20 12:41:09 +02:00
2026-05-20 12:41:09 +02:00
2026-05-20 16:51:13 +02:00
2026-05-20 12:41:09 +02:00
2026-05-20 12:41:09 +02:00
2026-05-20 12:41:09 +02:00
2026-05-21 15:45:17 +02:00
2026-05-21 15:45:17 +02:00
2026-05-21 15:45:17 +02:00
2026-05-20 16:51:13 +02:00
2026-04-30 23:19:31 +02:00
2026-05-20 16:51:13 +02:00
2026-05-20 16:51:13 +02:00
2026-04-30 23:03:46 +02:00
2026-05-20 12:41:09 +02:00
2026-05-20 16:51:13 +02:00
2026-01-16 16:31:31 +01:00
2024-03-21 01:09:22 +01:00
2022-06-01 02:48:58 +03:00

简体中文 | 日本語 | 한국어 | Italiano | Português Brasileiro

pnpm

Fast, disk space efficient package manager:

  • Fast. Up to 2x faster than the alternatives (see benchmark).
  • Efficient. Files inside node_modules are linked from a single content-addressable storage.
  • Great for monorepos.
  • Strict. A package can access only dependencies that are specified in its package.json.
  • Deterministic. Has a lockfile called pnpm-lock.yaml.
  • Works as a Node.js version manager. See pnpm runtime.
  • Works everywhere. Supports Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Battle-tested. Used in production by teams of all sizes since 2016.
  • See the full feature comparison with npm and Yarn.

To quote the Rush team:

Microsoft uses pnpm in Rush repos with hundreds of projects and hundreds of PRs per day, and we’ve found it to be very fast and reliable.

npm version OpenCollective OpenCollective X Follow Stand With Ukraine

Platinum Sponsors

Bit

Gold Sponsors

Sanity Discord Vite
SerpApi CodeRabbit Stackblitz
Workleap Nx

Silver Sponsors

Replit Cybozu devowl.io
u|screen Leniolabs_ Depot
Cerbos ⏱️ Time.now

Support this project by becoming a sponsor.

Background

pnpm uses a content-addressable filesystem to store all files from all module directories on a disk. When using npm, if you have 100 projects using lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be stored in a content-addressable storage, so:

  1. If you depend on different versions of lodash, only the files that differ are added to the store. If lodash has 100 files, and a new version has a change only in one of those files, pnpm update will only add 1 new file to the storage.
  2. All the files are saved in a single place on the disk. When packages are installed, their files are linked from that single place consuming no additional disk space. Linking is performed using either hard-links or reflinks (copy-on-write).

As a result, you save gigabytes of space on your disk and you have a lot faster installations! If you'd like more details about the unique node_modules structure that pnpm creates and why it works fine with the Node.js ecosystem, read this small article: Flat node_modules is not the only way.

💖 Like this project? Let people know with a tweet

Getting Started

Benchmark

pnpm is up to 2x faster than npm and Yarn classic. See all benchmarks here.

Benchmarks on an app with lots of dependencies:

License

MIT

S
Description
No description provided
Readme MIT
540 MiB
0 Stars 1 Watchers 0 Forks
Languages
Rust 68.2%
TypeScript 30.2%
JavaScript 1.4%
Shell 0.1%