* fix(sbom): resolve licenses for git-sourced dependencies `readPackageFileMap` did not handle `type: 'git'` resolutions, causing `pnpm sbom` to emit NOASSERTION and `pnpm licenses` to throw for any dependency installed from a git URL. Closes #11260 * fix: add missing store.cafs devDep, test tsconfigs, and size field - Add @pnpm/store.cafs devDependency and tsconfig reference to license-scanner so CI typecheck resolves the PackageFilesIndex import - Add test/tsconfig.json to pkg-finder so CI typechecks the new tests - Add required `size` field to PackageFileInfo test fixtures * fix: replace spellcheck-failing test strings * fix: use spellcheck-safe integrity string in test * style: fix import sort in pkg-finder test * fix(sbom): use packageIdFromSnapshot to match store index keys The SBOM used `snapshot.id ?? depPath` as the package ID, which includes the package name prefix (e.g. `left-pad@git+https://...`). The store index stores git packages under just the git URL without the name prefix. Use `packageIdFromSnapshot` which strips the prefix, matching how the licenses command already does it. Also fixes test store keys to match the real installer layout so the mismatch would have been caught by tests. * refactor: move git resolution check after tarball check Tarball resolutions are more common than type: 'git', so check them first. Per review feedback from @zkochan.
pnpm version (#11299)
pnpm version (#11299)
简体中文 | 日本語 | 한국어 | Italiano | Português Brasileiro
Fast, disk space efficient package manager:
- Fast. Up to 2x faster than the alternatives (see benchmark).
- Efficient. Files inside
node_modulesare linked from a single content-addressable storage. - Great for monorepos.
- Strict. A package can access only dependencies that are specified in its
package.json. - Deterministic. Has a lockfile called
pnpm-lock.yaml. - Works as a Node.js version manager. See pnpm runtime.
- Works everywhere. Supports Windows, Linux, and macOS.
- Battle-tested. Used in production by teams of all sizes since 2016.
- See the full feature comparison with npm and Yarn.
To quote the Rush team:
Microsoft uses pnpm in Rush repos with hundreds of projects and hundreds of PRs per day, and we’ve found it to be very fast and reliable.
Platinum Sponsors
|
|
Gold Sponsors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silver Sponsors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
⏱️ Time.now |
Support this project by becoming a sponsor.
Background
pnpm uses a content-addressable filesystem to store all files from all module directories on a disk. When using npm, if you have 100 projects using lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be stored in a content-addressable storage, so:
- If you depend on different versions of lodash, only the files that differ are added to the store.
If lodash has 100 files, and a new version has a change only in one of those files,
pnpm updatewill only add 1 new file to the storage. - All the files are saved in a single place on the disk. When packages are installed, their files are linked from that single place consuming no additional disk space. Linking is performed using either hard-links or reflinks (copy-on-write).
As a result, you save gigabytes of space on your disk and you have a lot faster installations!
If you'd like more details about the unique node_modules structure that pnpm creates and
why it works fine with the Node.js ecosystem, read this small article: Flat node_modules is not the only way.
💖 Like this project? Let people know with a tweet
Getting Started
Benchmark
pnpm is up to 2x faster than npm and Yarn classic. See all benchmarks here.
Benchmarks on an app with lots of dependencies: