Mention the backup fix for redone files with --inplace.

This commit is contained in:
Wayne Davison
2005-02-27 08:02:06 +00:00
parent e6bc6f4232
commit f122383179

6
NEWS
View File

@@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ Changes since 2.6.3:
relative path), the backup code was erroneously trying to backup a
file that was put into the partial-dir.
- If a file gets resent in a single transfer and the --backup option is
enabled along with --inplace, rsync no longer performs a duplicate
backup (it used to overwrite the first backup with the failed file).
- One call to flush_write_file() was not being checked for an error.
- The --no-relative option was not being sent from the client to a
@@ -279,7 +283,7 @@ Changes since 2.6.3:
- If --inplace is specified, the generator flags any transfer that is
using an alternate basis file so that the sender can use the entire
file in the rsync algorithm (unlike a normal --inplace update).
basis file in the rsync algorithm (unlike a normal --inplace update).
- The sending of exclude names is done using filter-rule syntax. This
means that all names have a prefixed rule indicator, even excludes