Brad Fitzpatrick a58a8fc1e8 .: permit running binary built with TS_GO_NEXT=1 ...

The old check was too aggressive and required TS_GO_NEXT=1 at runtime
as well, which is too strict and onerous.

This is a sanity check only (and an outdated one, at that); it's okay for
it to be slightly loose and permit two possible values. If either is working,
we're already way past the old bug that this was introduced to catch.

Updates tailscale/corp#36382

Change-Id: Ib9a62e10382cd889ba590c3539e6b8535c6b19fe
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>

2026-02-23 09:37:04 -08:00

1.1 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw