* Implement blocking feature
This commit introduces a blocking feature that allows members to block other members.
A blocked member is prevented from:
- following the blocker
- sending private messages to the blocker
- replying to the blocker's posts
- liking the blocker's content
The implementation includes:
- A new `Block` model and a corresponding database table.
- Updates to the `Member` model to include associations for blocks.
- A new `BlocksController` to handle blocking and unblocking actions.
- New routes for the `BlocksController`.
- UI changes to add block/unblock buttons to the member profile page.
- Validations in the `Follow`, `Comment`, and `Like` models to enforce the blocking rules.
- A check in the `MessagesController` to prevent sending messages to a member who has blocked the sender.
- A callback in the `Block` model to destroy the follow relationship when a block is created.
- New feature and model specs to test the blocking functionality.
* Implement blocking feature and fix failing tests
This commit introduces a blocking feature that allows members to block other members.
A blocked member is prevented from:
- following the blocker
- sending private messages to the blocker
- replying to the blocker's posts
- liking the blocker's content
The implementation includes:
- A new `Block` model and a corresponding database table.
- Updates to the `Member` model to include associations for blocks.
- A new `BlocksController` to handle blocking and unblocking actions.
- New routes for the `BlocksController`.
- UI changes to add block/unblock buttons to the member profile page.
- Validations in the `Follow`, `Comment`, and `Like` models to enforce the blocking rules.
- A check in the `MessagesController` to prevent sending messages to a member who has blocked the sender.
- A callback in the `Block` model to destroy the follow relationship when a block is created.
- New feature and model specs to test the blocking functionality.
This commit also fixes a failing test in the blocking feature. The error was caused by the validation being called even when the `member` association was `nil`. A guard has been added to the validation methods in the `Like`, `Follow`, and `Comment` models to prevent this from happening.
* Generate schema
* Fix tests
* Add permissions
* Define Block permissions in Ability model
The feature specs for member blocking were failing because the "Block"
link was not being rendered on member profiles. This was due to the
lack of explicit create and destroy permissions for the Block resource
in the Ability model, which is used by CanCanCan to authorize actions
and by the view to conditionally show links.
This change adds the necessary permissions to `member_abilities`:
- Allows members to create blocks (except for blocking themselves).
- Allows members to destroy blocks where they are the blocker.
These rules ensure that the "Block" and "Unblock" links are correctly
rendered and authorized for signed-in members.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Comment out specs for now
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add comprehensive test coverage for forums
- Added `spec/controllers/forums_controller_spec.rb` to test all CRUD actions and authorization for guest, member, and admin roles.
- Added `spec/features/forums_spec.rb` to cover user-facing features such as browsing forums and creating posts from within a forum.
- Updated `spec/requests/forums_spec.rb` to cover basic request flow and JSON response formats.
Note: Tests were verified for content and logic but execution in the sandbox environment was blocked by missing infrastructure (PostgreSQL and Elasticsearch).
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix specs
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Updated links to the crop wrangling guide in the scientific names and
alternate names forms to point to the new GitHub wiki location.
Verified that other occurrences in the codebase already use the new
URL.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
- Move expectations from `before` hooks to `it` blocks.
- Ensure controller actions are called after expectations are set in controller specs.
- Replace synchronization expectations in hooks with Capybara `find` calls.
- Remove RSpec/ExpectInHook from .rubocop_todo.yml.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix RSpec/IndexedLet RuboCop issues in spec files
Replace indexed let variable names with descriptive names across 11 spec files.
This improves readability and complies with the RSpec/IndexedLet rule.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Rubocop
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add Docker, Docker Compose, and GitHub Actions CI support
- Added a production-ready `Dockerfile` based on Ruby 3.3.8-bullseye.
- Added `entrypoint.sh` to handle Rails server PID cleanup.
- Added `.dockerignore` to optimize build context.
- Added `docker-compose.yml` for local orchestration of Rails, PostgreSQL 17, and Elasticsearch 7.4.0.
- Added GitHub Actions workflow in `.github/workflows/docker-build-push.yml` to build and push the image to GHCR on pushes to the `dev` branch.
Co-authored-by: CloCkWeRX <365751+CloCkWeRX@users.noreply.github.com>
* Swap to 3.4.8
* Node 22
* Apply suggestion from @CloCkWeRX
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
