Running the same example twice
borks encryption.
Instead point to an example that shows how to do it.
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
This patch cleans up the `SlidingSync::stream` method. It renames variables,
improves log messages etc.
This patch also creates a new `MAXIMUM_SLIDING_SYNC_SESSION_EXPIRATION`
constant. This value was previously hardcoded and lost in the code, now it's
easier to spot it for further updates.
This patch finally renames the `failure_count` field to `reset_counter`,
because it doesn't count the number of failure, but the number of
`ErrorKind::UnknownPos` exactly, i.e. the number of times we reset the
`SlidingSync` state.
This patch cleans up the `SlidingSync::sync_once` method by renaming variables,
adding more comments, simplifying the code by reducing the number of variables
etc.
This patch also changes `futures_util::join!` to `futures_util::future::join`.
It does the same but the macro needs the `async-await-macros` feature to be
turned on, while the second works without any features.
Finally, this patch improves the log messages by making them more clear for a
new reader.
I admit this patch is quite tricky. Please try to follow me.
So, first off, in `SlidingSyncRoom::new`, we were clearing the timeline,
because somehow it exists twice in memory at this step.
Which led me to understand how `SlidingSync::handle_response` was working.
I've clarified how this part of the code works. We are dealing with 2 kind of
responses for a specific reason: `SyncResponse` and `v4::Response`, now it's
documented and I hope it's clearer.
Then, I notice that we were passing a clone of the entire sliding sync
response (`v4::Response`) to `Client::process_sliding_sync`. I thought it was
suboptimal, so I've updated the code to take a reference. It led me to update
`BaseClient::process_sliding_sync`. It was a little bit tricky, but I reckon we
have less clones now than before.
And now, back to `SlidingSync::handle_response`, I was able to compute the
`timeline` correctly by draining it from the `v4::Response`, or by moving it
from `SyncResponse`. So it's no longer necessary to have this clearing code
inside `SlidingSyncRoom::new`. Honestly it has nothing to do at this place
before.
To conclude: We have cleaner code, and less clones.
What thing I reckon could be optimized, is that the entire `timeline`
(`Vec<TimelineEvent>`) is cloned to be passed to `Client::handle_timeline`. So
this timeline exists in 2 places: in Sliding Sync, and somewhere else. I don't
believe it's a problem now, that's how it works, but we must be aware of that.
The `Client::login_custom` allows to login by using a custom login
method. In particular, it is possible to login to Synapse which supports
JWT authentication.
Signed-off-by: boxdot <d@zerovolt.org>
